The lawsuit, which centered around text messages between Brenda Tracy and her friend Ahlan Alvarado that were released by Tucker and his attorneys last year, had been filed on behalf of Tracy's nonprofit and an LLC in her name. Alvarado, who has since died, was Tracy's friend of two decades and also worked as her booking assistant for her nonprofit, Set The Expectation.
MSU fired Tucker for cause last year after Tracy reported that he'd sexually harassed her and the university investigated. Tucker's attorneys have said the messages show Tracy had a personal, consensual relationship with Tucker.
During a hearing on Thursday morning, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Wanda Stokes dismissed six of the seven counts in the lawsuit because attorneys for Tracy's nonprofit had not met legal standards for the lawsuit to proceed to discovery. She ruled the remaining count was moot because a protective order previously agreed upon between the parties will remain in place.
The protective order bars the release of specific information related to sexual assault, harassment or gender discrimination victims.
The dismissal with prejudice means attorneys for Tracy's nonprofit can't refile the lawsuit.
Eric Delaporte, an attorney for Tracy's nonprofit, said he plans to appeal Stokes' ruling. He also said he will look into remedies for what he said were lies Tucker's attorneys made in court and in filings. He said Tucker and his attorneys ruined the nonprofit's name when they released some texts previously.
Tracy, a national sexual violence prevention advocate who has spoken to MSU's football team and was on campus another time as an honorary captain for a spring game, has said Tucker sexually harassed her, including making sexual comments and having unwanted phone sex with her in 2022.
In October, on the day of a key hearing in the former coach's harassment case, Tucker's legal team released pages of text messages between Tracy and Alvarado.
Tracy then sought a court order preventing Tucker's team from releasing additional messages, arguing further releases would include sensitive or confidential matters that could cause irreparable harm. Private discussions between Tracy and Alvarado "involve highly sensitive information regarding other survivors and their families," Tracy wrote in an affidavit filed with the motion for the restraining order.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Welcome to NewsBreak, an open platform where diverse perspectives converge. Most of our content comes from established publications and journalists, as well as from our extensive network of tens of thousands of creators who contribute to our platform. We empower individuals to share insightful viewpoints through short posts and comments. It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency: our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. We strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation. Join us in shaping the news narrative together.
Comments / 0