There’s no homeless ‘right’ to sleep rough — and the Supreme Court seems to agree

In a Supreme Court showdown Monday over whether the homeless have a “right” to camp in public, almost no one mentioned the actual victims of that crazy idea — everyone who’s not homeless.

Homeless advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union, told the court living on the streets is a “victimless” crime. Victimless?

Everyone who has to step over needles and human poop and navigate around half-conscious bodies on their way to work or taking their kids to school is a victim.

Every store owner whose entrance is blocked by makeshift cardboard shelters is a victim.

Every family that wants to use a park and finds it cluttered with sprawling tents is a victim.

The homeless are more likely than the general population to commit violent crimes.

The public has every reason to be wary.

Municipalities all over the United States are watching the case, City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, which challenges a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling barring penalties for sleeping with blankets and other paraphernalia on public property.

The Ninth Circuit — known for its left-wing rulings — says these penalties amount to “cruel and unusual punishment” because the homeless have “no choice.”

Supreme Court poised to allow camping bans to stand in major homelessness case

No choice is another whopper.

San Francisco authorities report that 60% of homeless individuals living on the street refuse shelter when it’s offered.

Here in New York City, every homeless person is guaranteed shelter.

When Mayor Adams sends outreach teams from the Department of Homeless Services to the tent encampments, a staggering 95% decline shelter and opt to stay outside.

Justice Clarence Thomas got closest to this practical truth when he asked if the Grants Pass, Ore., ordinance criminalizes lacking a home or the deliberate decision to sleep rough instead of going to a shelter.

A big surprise is who is siding with Grants Pass: Democratic pols including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and a long list of big blue cities except — you guessed it — New York.

Grants Pass lawyers explain the Ninth Circuit has “erected a judicial roadblock” affecting virtually every municipality in the nine Western states in its jurisdiction, preventing them from clearing encampments.

The results are “crime, fires, the resurgence of medieval diseases, environmental harm, and record levels of drug overdoses and deaths on public streets.”

Phoenix city officials, in a friend-of-the-court brief, complain Ninth Circuit judges are acting like “homeless policy czars,” usurping what local governments should decide.

Dr. Phil left speechless after real estate agent claims that squatting is justified by colonization

Justice Brett Kavanaugh echoed that, warning against having federal courts “micromanaging homeless policy.”

That’s what’s been happening. Anti-camping regulations adopted in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Portland were all overridden by the Ninth Circuit’s precedent.

And courts in the rest of the country have cited that precedent as a reason to tolerate homeless encampments.

Grants Pass is so atypical of the larger cities wrestling with homelessness that the outcome of the case is somewhat difficult to predict.

It’s a town of 40,000 with a small, church-run shelter.

But Monday’s argument suggests the justices will rule 6-3 or 5-4 that municipalities can ban sleeping on public property.

The ruling will affect the entire nation.

Except, perhaps, New York City, which is abandoningx common sense.

The City Council adopted a Homeless Bill of Rights in 2023, making Gotham the only big city with an explicit right to sleep in public spaces.

Mayor Adams did not veto it. There would have been no point — the bill passed unanimously.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR MORNING REPORT NEWSLETTER

What are city lawmakers thinking?

Homeless people deserve compassion, but allowing them to freeze to death or succumb to disease isn’t compassionate.

Data show they are shortening their own lifespan by 30 years or more.

Jumaane Williams, the city’s public advocate, sponsored the Homeless Bill of Rights, blathering that the city has to look at the root causes of homelessness rather than “stoking fear.”

Of course root causes must be addressed, but in the meantime, fear is warranted.

And the public deserves clean, safe streets.

Fair warning: Williams is eyeing Adams’ job as mayor.

The court’s expected ruling will allow local authorities across America to crack down on homeless encampments.

But the justices cannot command they do it.

The law-abiding public — who are the real victims of homelessness — need to elect local leaders who will say no to preferring the rights of the homeless over the rights of the rest of us.

New York City voters, it’s up to you.

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York.

Twitter: @Betsy_McCaughey

For top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com.