Events

The Sacramento Bee

partner publisher · 142.6K followers

Is California failing to provide state worker unions data as required by law?

A 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that outlawed mandatory public-sector union fees changed how unions do business. By not collecting dues from nonmembers, a gap was created in many unions’ pocketbooks, requiring those representing California state workers to adapt. To buffer the anticipated fallout, labor advocates proactively turned to the California Legislature the year before and Assembly Bill 119 was signed into law . The measure required public employers to grant union representatives access to new-employee orientations and regularly provide workers’ contact information . Now several state worker unions say California isn’t following that law. Flawed contact data has turned an organizing lifeline into an administrative liability. In extreme cases, one organizer reports noncompliance resulted in them dialing rank-and-file workers — only to have their supervisor answer. More broadly, the state’s noncompliance can delay outreach efforts, potentially stripping unions of the new members they need to offset the revenue losses delivered by the 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Janus v. AFSCME. “These are legal obligations, not optional courtesies, and we’re holding the state accountable,” SEIU Local 1000 President Anica Walls said. Under the previous framework, unions generally collected “fair-share” fees from nonmembers to cover the costs of contract negotiations. Under

California · 11h