DSC_0295.JPG

The Prince William Board of County Supervisors in February 2023.

With opposition mounting to a proposed pay raise for county elected officials, many on the Prince William Board of County Supervisors are staying quiet.

On Tuesday night, a public hearing on the county’s proposed fiscal 2024 budget brought out several opponents to a plan that would increase supervisor pay by 67% for the next four years and raise the board chair’s pay by 70%.

Currently, supervisor pay in Prince William is the lowest among all the county governing bodies in Northern Virginia, with supervisors earning $43,422 annually and the chair earning $49,452. The proposed budget, drafted by County Executive Chris Shorter and county staff, would raise the chair’s salary to $84,739 and supervisor pay to $74,282 starting Jan. 1 of next year, when a new board takes office.

In Fairfax County, by contrast, supervisors make $95,000 and the chair makes $100,000, although the board voted this week to raise those amounts to about $123,000 and $128,000, respectively.

Last year, Arlington’s board voted to raise the salaries for supervisors and the chair to $77,648 annually and $83,413, respectively. Loudoun pays its chair $81,1000 and supervisors $66,826.

In Prince William, supervisor salaries have gone unchanged since 2011. In its budget proposal, county staff recommended the salaries be raised to the median of Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun and Alexandria salaries.

But several public commenters Tuesday night objected.

“The most cynical and disturbing proposition … is a 70% increase in pay for the board chair and a 67% increase for all other district supervisors,” county resident Paige Kenyon-Page told the board during Tuesday’s public hearing. “Not an increase in pay for our teachers, not to our EMTs, not to our firefighters, not even to our police force.”

County teachers, police and fire and rescue workers are, in fact, all set to see pay raises in the upcoming fiscal year, but none will receive bumps nearing the 60% mark.

“Holy moly, do you really … want to do that when you’re coming up for election?” Mary Lauren, a resident of Yates Ford Road, said Tuesday. “Why shouldn’t teachers be getting that much? If anybody gets a raise, teachers are the ones who should be getting a raise, and certainly not the board.”

The timing of the raise proposal, with all eight board seats up for election in the fall, is no coincidence. Supervisors can vote only to increase salaries for future boards, meaning pay raises can occur only every four years.

While technically considered part-time employees, supervisors in the past have spoken about the demands of the job, which include lengthy board and committee meetings, work sessions, community events and constituent service. Last year, Neabsco Supervisor Victor Angry said at a board meeting that serving on the board is a full-time job and makes taking on full-time work in the private sector impossible.

Some studies have shown that increasing elected official pay to be more competitive with the private sector can increase competition and, as a result, accountability.

But many supervisors are staying mum on the proposal. Chair Ann Wheeler and Woodbridge Supervisor Margaret Franklin, both Democrats, told InsideNoVa that they had no comment on the plan. A representative for Occoquan Supervisor Kenny Boddye said he had not taken a position on the increase.

Angry, a Democrat, and Republican Brentsville Supervisor Jeanine Lawson have said they could be open to the idea but have not committed to supporting the raises. They could not be reached for comment on this story.

So far, Coles District Supervisor Yesli Vega, a Republican, has been the only member of the board to take a firm position on the proposal, telling the Prince William Times that she opposed the raises earlier this month.

The proposal has yet to come up in a work session. Because the $1.61 billion proposed budget is a substantial document with other county matters under consideration, it’s possible the raises could go through without seeing a direct up-or-down vote.

Jared Foretek covers the Manassas area and regional news across Northern Virginia. Reach him at jforetek@insidenova.com

(0 Ratings)

(9) comments

Tony Lopacki

They all deserve a HUGE raise after all, they raised our taxes HUGELY and gave us less service and much more crime…LOL

Rhonda Gittens

Why are their jobs part time in the first place. And if, as one of them said, it's impossible to hold another job with this job because it's full time. How do they get their jobs changed to full time status?

Tom Manson

Few would do their jobs for $50k/yr.

Dale Dobacki

Make ALL tax and salary decisions ballot issues. only then will tax payers get desired and effective outcomes.

The current board is corrupt and lack the integrity to make further decisions.

PWC RetaliationIsReal

I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a discussion for the possibility of supervisor raises, nor giving them a reasonable raise. However a 67%-70% raise is absurd, particularly when the Board has gone above and beyond to ensure that other agencies within the county receive very small adjustments in their salaries. Their raises should be reflective of and inline with the smallest raise proposed to be given to any one agency within the county. So whatever the lowest proposed adjustment is, that should be the same adjustment available for the Board.

When the county has lost a significant portion of its Police, Fire & Rescue, Deputies and ADC Corrections staff and the inevitable overtime costs exceed budget constraints (if they havent already) then we shall see how agreeable to Board is to considering Realistic adjustments to wages that cover cost of living increases. I can assure you, the jobs of law enforcement, deputies, fire and rescue and ADC corrections staff are considerably harder and more time consuming that anything the Board contends with on any given day and NONE of them are being considered for anything remotely close to a 67% or 70% raise.

It's obvious that the residents of PWC have in the past, chosen poorly in regards to their elected County Board members and have continued to do so up until and including present day. It's embarrassing how behind PWC is in comparison to other counties.

Lynne June

Check out the bloated school budget. They just keep adding administrators with huge salaries, and not efficiently.

larry Thesame

I see the Greed from D.C. is spreading to more incompetent fools down here. what have you accomplished for PWC that you believe you're entitled to a raise in Salary? You should be grateful to the Voters for letting you serve them, but you are not. it is called Public Service, not steal from Tax Payers to enrich your selves at our expense. Shameful as usual.

JP Raflo

Key line in the article..."Supervisor salaries have gone unchanged since 2011"...and that's pretty much like everything else in PWC.

Data Center revenues are the answer to PWC's needs whether it be teacher pay, first responder pay, school system needs, parks and recreation system needs, diversifying the county revenue streams and yes even Supervisor pay increases.

Ed Pa

Do you have a financial interest in paving over the countryside or do you really believe it's "for the good of the county" to replace every last tree with concrete and asphalt?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.