<body><div><figure><img src="https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?type=thumbnail_580x000&amp;url=2Tfuvu_1GvQmlaw00" alt="https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2Tfuvu_1GvQmlaw00" width="720" height="383" ><figcaption>Letters to the editor can be submitted to letters@chronline.com.</figcaption></figure>Silly me. When I read the Nov 5. edition of The Chronicle, I expected to see a big picture of Marie Gluesenkamp Perez on the front page. She was, after all, the winner of a race of national importance. But no! She gets a little picture (2.5 inches by 1.375 inches, to be exact) up in the corner. John Braun loses and he gets a 5-by-7.5-inch photo above the fold and a 5.75-by-3.75-inch below the fold and a 5.75-by-3.75-inch photo on page 7.What the heck? I guess she was just the wrong kind of winner. Anita O’RourkeChehalis</div></body>

Block Source: Chronicle

Misinformation

Clickbait

Old or repetitive news

Explicit content

Location not relevant

When I read the Nov 5. edition of The Chronicle, I expected to see a big picture of Marie Gluesenkamp Perez on the front page. She was, after all, the winner of a race of national importance. But no! She gets a little picture (2.5 inches by 1.375 inches, to...

Letter to the editor: Measuring photos in the general election edition

Comments