Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Pupils run between lessons at King's School Bruton.
‘I must say that the school and the staff never treated us any differently from the fee-paying pupils, but that was not always true of the pupils themselves.’ Photograph: Adrian Sherratt/Alamy
‘I must say that the school and the staff never treated us any differently from the fee-paying pupils, but that was not always true of the pupils themselves.’ Photograph: Adrian Sherratt/Alamy

At private school, I saw the arrogance of those ‘born to rule’

This article is more than 1 year old

Norma Cradock recalls being a pupil with a free place at a direct grant school, and the snobbery of her fee-paying classmates

Reading the article by Kalwant Bhopal and Martin Myers (Elite universities aren’t hotbeds of ‘wokery’: our research shows they’re rife with racism and classism, 30 January) took me back 77 years to when I was an 11-year-old pupil at Haberdashers’ Aske’s school for girls in Acton, which was then a direct grant school, meaning some places were free and others were paid for. I was one of a handful of girls who were awarded a free place as a result of good performance in the 11-plus examination, courtesy of Middlesex county council.

I must say that the school and the staff never treated us any differently from the fee-paying pupils, but that was not always true of the pupils themselves, who often made me feel inferior and undeserving of my place.

One of them once said to me: “You wouldn’t be here if your father had to pay for you.” Since my father was a railwayman and my mother worked in a sweet factory, that was undoubtedly true, so I just swallowed the insult and didn’t reply.

Had I shared their “born to rule” mentality, I would have had the courage robustly to reply with an equal truth: “And you are only here because your father can pay for you.” I have sometimes looked back with regret at my timidity.
Norma Cradock
Bristol

Most viewed

Most viewed