Alleged cop killer's fate now in the hands of an Orleans Parish jury
Bridges is accused of fatally shooting New Orleans Officer Marcus McNeil in 2017.
Bridges is accused of fatally shooting New Orleans Officer Marcus McNeil in 2017.
Bridges is accused of fatally shooting New Orleans Officer Marcus McNeil in 2017.
The trial of a man accused of killing a New Orleans police officer ended after over a week of testimony.
A jury was handed the case and began deliberations in the first-degree murder trial 0f Darren Bridges on Tuesday afternoon.
Bridges is charged with fatally shooting New Orleans police Officer Marcus McNeil in October of 2017.
If convicted of first-degree murder, Bridges would face a mandatory life sentence. However, he could be found guilty of a lesser charge like manslaughter or negligent homicide, which both carry a range of possible sentences.
During closing arguments, District Attorney Jason Williams, who has chosen to prosecute the case himself, told jurors that Bridges "executed" McNeil, who was known by the nickname "Milk Dud."
Jurors were shown body camera footage and video from surveillance cameras, which captured the deadly shooting.
Williams said the third and final shot fired by Bridges indicated his intent to murder McNeil because, in the video, the officer is seen lying facedown on the ground.
Meantime, defense attorneys asked jurors to carefully consider the evidence and what it shows about the actions of the NOPD that night. They also argued that cameras did not capture everything that happened on Oct. 13, 2017.
The two sides also discussed the difference between first-degree murder and justifiable homicide.
WDSU spoke with former prosecutor and legal analyst Laura Cannizzaro Rodrigue about how jury deliberations typically go.
"Real personalities start to come out once the deliberations begin. They have not had the opportunity to discuss the case yet. They don’t begin to discuss the actual facts of the case until deliberations," Cannizzaro Rodrigue said. "This is sort of where the rubber meets the road in terms of deliberation. People will get heated. They will start to argue their perspectives, and you know, they’re talking about deliberating a penalty that involves a life sentence. I expect those conversations to be thorough."