I have been following the recent articles in your publication concerning the sale of Claremont Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in Carlisle. A citizens group had formed and advocated for retaining the facility, which had served elderly citizens in need of housing and special care for almost 200 years. Sadly, the decision was made to sell the property.
I commend the Friends of Claremont for their common sense proposal to the commissioners that outlined a plan for use of the funds realized by the sale. An Op-Ed in your publication followed the presentation of their ideas. The tone of the article seemed to demean the efforts of the group.
Two points made were (1) “the future of long-term care is moving away from institutions; federal policies are aimed at keeping individuals in their homes as long as possible, lowering the number of folks relying on nursing homes”, and (2) applying the funds to offset future property tax increases for seniors would allow more of them to remain in their homes.
These are shortsighted, simplistic reactions to a complex issue. Most families make every effort to keep a loved one at home, but there comes a point when the level of care needed far exceeds what can be provided in the home. I urge the writer to shadow a health care worker at a long term care facility. One will quickly discover that there will always be a critical need for a place like Claremont where people in need of specialized care, but unable to pay, will be welcomed. And I assure you, no one is there because they couldn’t afford property taxes.
I urge all parties to continue dialogue to resolve their differences. Cumberland County can be proud that they have dedicated citizens like Friends of Claremont who step forward at a time like this to advocate for the elderly and infirm in the community. God speed your efforts.
Marie Fishel, Duncannon, Pa.
Ad Choices