Options

George Clarke's Flipping Fast- C4 Wed 9pm

BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
Forum Member
✭✭✭
This looks promising, though probably should have been Scarlette and Stuarts show in their own right. They feel so fresh compared to tge old C4 property guard.

Essentially six teams get £100k to develop property over the year and keep any profit made. Highest profit keeps the £100k.
«134

Comments

  • Options
    pearlsandplumspearlsandplums Posts: 29,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sounds good
    I do love a bit of George Clarke even if everything he sees is either the greatest or the worst thing he's ever seen :)
  • Options
    BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    edited 25/05/22 - 20:50 #3
    Used to enjoy Amazing Spaces but the show he did when architects couldn't grasp the concept of budget was awful.

    This feels a bit rushed - I know it's "Flipping Fast" but the first one seemed to be done over the break.
  • Options
    pearlsandplumspearlsandplums Posts: 29,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brekkie wrote: »
    Used to enjoy Amazing Spaces but the show he did when architects couldn't grasp the concept of budget was awful.

    This feels a bit rushed - I know it's "Flipping Fast" but the first one seemed to be done over the break.

    Ugly house to lovely house ?
    Our budget is £150k and the architect would come up with a plan costing three times that. Every week.
  • Options
    ennui 57ennui 57 Posts: 1,176
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Just started watching on plus one.

    Does anyone remember ''Colin and Justin'', the Scottish interiors pair?

    They did a programme called The Million Pound Property Experiment.

    ''Million Pound Property Experiment was a BBC Television series which originally aired on BBC Two in the United Kingdom in 2003. In this, McAllister and Ryan renovated and re-sold properties for a profit as they gambled with a £100,000 loan from the BBC, with the ultimate goal being a sale of a property for £1M. Taking more than two years they bought, renovated and sold seven properties across the UK with the help of project manager Nigel Leck. Their final property sold for £1.25 million and after paying back all loans they made a profit of nearly £300,000 which was donated to BBC's Children in Need Appeal.''

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_McAllister_and_Justin_Ryan#:~:text=Colin%20Lewis%20McAllister%20and%20Justin,billed%20as%20Colin%20and%20Justin.
  • Options
    BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yes, that's the one. Get it mixed up with his other show (Old House, New Home?), which were very similar. Always feel he's just waiting for Kevin McCloud to retire which isn't happening anytime soon.

    Does seem he was involved from the start here but I think it's a show which would have benefitted from all new talent. Scarlette and Stuart seem refreshing here, George not so much. Indeed the best property show on C4 last year was the one with Tinie Tempah who was surprisingly brilliant in the role.


    I like the idea of this show more than the end product.
  • Options
    carriebabycarriebaby Posts: 1,151
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yes, im enjoying this, looks promising. The older couple tonight didn't have a clue, but fair play they got stuck in. The younger girl had a game plan, going in all teeth and hair and everyone will underestimate her when really she was just 'the face' with a big team behind her.
  • Options
    tim123tim123 Posts: 3,563
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    TBH I think the format's wrong

    they should each be able to keep their own profit

    The old couple said "We haven't come here to walk away with nothing". Well I have news for them. That's exactly what 5 of the 6 teams are going to do, even if they make loads of profit (but someone makes even more than they do)
  • Options
    BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    They do get to keep their own profit. The winners get £100k on top.
  • Options
    tim123tim123 Posts: 3,563
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brekkie wrote: »
    They do get to keep their own profit. The winners get £100k on top.

    I'm sure that's not how it was introduced

  • Options
    R VR V Posts: 465
    Forum Member
    I reckon this could be quite good
  • Options
    BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tim123 wrote: »
    Brekkie wrote: »
    They do get to keep their own profit. The winners get £100k on top.

    I'm sure that's not how it was introduced
    The interviews and press around the series have made it clear the others keep what profit they do make.
  • Options
    Ivory LaceIvory Lace Posts: 821
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I really enjoyed it.
  • Options
    Bradders33Bradders33 Posts: 310
    Forum Member
    Just caught up with this. I enjoyed it.

    I tend to not watch shows like Amazing Spaces and Grand Designs as some of the resulting homes make me insanely jealous and depressed. 😄

    But after wanting to throw something at my TV watching The Great House Giveaway recently, this Flipping Fast is a refreshing change. The participants are able to choose, bid and sell on their properties unlike Giveaway, and although George offers advice, he's not sneering and full of himself like Simon O'Brien.

    I was watching through my fingers at the older couple going in boots first. I'm pleased they didn't make a loss though. By rights, being retired and having a caravan they should be best placed to actually make a good stab at this, hope the scare of their first property gives them a reality check.

    Looking forward to seeing the other participants in future shows.

    Also, is it me, or do the fees seem a lot higher on The Great House Giveaway compared to this show?
  • Options
    tim123tim123 Posts: 3,563
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brekkie wrote: »
    tim123 wrote: »
    Brekkie wrote: »
    They do get to keep their own profit. The winners get £100k on top.

    I'm sure that's not how it was introduced
    The interviews and press around the series have made it clear the others keep what profit they do make.

    so you need to watch secondary interviews to understand TV programs now, do you?

    whatever happed to the idea that program formats should be self containing?

  • Options
    pearlsandplumspearlsandplums Posts: 29,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I think George might have had some work done himself
  • Options
    BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tim123 wrote: »
    Brekkie wrote: »
    tim123 wrote: »
    Brekkie wrote: »
    They do get to keep their own profit. The winners get £100k on top.

    I'm sure that's not how it was introduced
    The interviews and press around the series have made it clear the others keep what profit they do make.

    so you need to watch secondary interviews to understand TV programs now, do you?

    whatever happed to the idea that program formats should be self containing?
    It was explained in the show itself. Just pay attention rather than blaming others for your lack of understanding.
  • Options
    pearlsandplumspearlsandplums Posts: 29,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I don't think the timeline of this show makes any sense.
    They're getting on as if one couple have done nothing, but one of the others has bought, renovated and sold a house.
    I know they can't show everything everyweek, but I doubt the couple who haven't bought a house yet haven't sat and dine nothing for four months.
  • Options
    BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yes, it seems a bit odd. We're not being told how long each reno is taking or how far in they are but as most say they aim to do 3 or 4 properties you'd imagine it's 3-4 months before they sell. So I suspect the last two teams starting next week actually started before the first house was sold, even if it took them longer to get a property.

    Some fairly healthy profits so far though with three getting around £20-£25k for houses costing around £80k, which is far higher than most on The Great House Giveaway (but without the loan fees!). Was a bit odd though to praise the mother/daughter for getting £500 more profit than the brothers though and attributing it to them dressing the house when they spent far more than £500 and quite a lot of time on the dressing. If anything it suggested dressing the property wasn't worth the time or money - and they really overdressed the property too rather, pretty much designing it completely rather than just doing enough to show how the spaces work.
  • Options
    pearlsandplumspearlsandplums Posts: 29,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brekkie wrote: »
    Yes, it seems a bit odd. We're not being told how long each reno is taking or how far in they are but as most say they aim to do 3 or 4 properties you'd imagine it's 3-4 months before they sell. So I suspect the last two teams starting next week actually started before the first house was sold, even if it took them longer to get a property.

    Some fairly healthy profits so far though with three getting around £20-£25k for houses costing around £80k, which is far higher than most on The Great House Giveaway (but without the loan fees!). Was a bit odd though to praise the mother/daughter for getting £500 more profit than the brothers though and attributing it to them dressing the house when they spent far more than £500 and quite a lot of time on the dressing. If anything it suggested dressing the property wasn't worth the time or money - and they really overdressed the property too rather, pretty much designing it completely rather than just doing enough to show how the spaces work.

    I thought they all started at the same time. All it needs is a counter "8 months to go" for each team. I am enjoying the show though
  • Options
    ennui 57ennui 57 Posts: 1,176
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brekkie wrote: »

    Was a bit odd though to praise the mother/daughter for getting £500 more profit than the brothers though and attributing it to them dressing the house when they spent far more than £500 and quite a lot of time on the dressing. If anything it suggested dressing the property wasn't worth the time or money - and they really overdressed the property too rather, pretty much designing it completely rather than just doing enough to show how the spaces work.

    I agree with the above.

    They seemed so convinced about their own taste, and whilst it was okay, it wasn't what I would've chosen personally. And there were some shocking 'snagging' issues.


    Does anyone remember ''The House Doctor'' programme from donkey's years ago? She always recommended bland and impersonal when dressing a house for sale.


  • Options
    Lottie64Lottie64 Posts: 289
    Forum Member
    ennui 57 wrote: »
    Brekkie wrote: »

    Was a bit odd though to praise the mother/daughter for getting £500 more profit than the brothers though and attributing it to them dressing the house when they spent far more than £500 and quite a lot of time on the dressing. If anything it suggested dressing the property wasn't worth the time or money - and they really overdressed the property too rather, pretty much designing it completely rather than just doing enough to show how the spaces work.

    I agree with the above.

    They seemed so convinced about their own taste, and whilst it was okay, it wasn't what I would've chosen personally. And there were some shocking 'snagging' issues.


    Does anyone remember ''The House Doctor'' programme from donkey's years ago? She always recommended bland and impersonal when dressing a house for sale.


    I used to enjoy House Doctor and you're right, the advice was always to ' de-personalise' and 'de-clutter'. I've always tried to follow that advice whenever we've been moving and just kept my fingers crossed that potential buyers don't open certain cupboards and get squashed under all the clutter that falls out 😀!
  • Options
    roddydogsroddydogs Posts: 10,309
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    edited 04/06/22 - 07:33 #23
    Who buys a house complete with furniture? And arnt the " glamour experts " annoying. Saying the same thing with different words, stating the b obvious repeatedly as does george.
  • Options
    pearlsandplumspearlsandplums Posts: 29,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    edited 04/06/22 - 07:47 #24
    roddydogs wrote: »
    Who buys a house complete with furniture? And arnt the " glamour experts " annoying. Saying the same thing with different words, stating the b obvious repeatedly as does george.

    I got wardrobes and some other furniture "free" with my house. I could see it being appealing to a first time buyer to have the option to have the house dressed. I would have snapped it up, as I had nothing furniture wise.
    I don't see the point in the other two people.
  • Options
    BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 24,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sometimes people need to imagine their own furniture in a property too. Yes, stick a sofa, table and bed in there and a couple of mirrors or pictures but that's enough.

    The other shocking thing this week was the revelation the couple who made a tiny profit last week accepted the first offer on the first day of viewing, despiteit offering very littleprofit. Also confirms the participants know how much their houses sell for before they are told again for tge benefit of TV.


    Quite surprised C4 haven't put this in full on All4. As much as that annoys me at times it is a show more suited to binge watching than a Kirsty and Phil series.
  • Options
    pearlsandplumspearlsandplums Posts: 29,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brekkie wrote: »
    Sometimes people need to imagine their own furniture in a property too. Yes, stick a sofa, table and bed in there and a couple of mirrors or pictures but that's enough.

    The other shocking thing this week was the revelation the couple who made a tiny profit last week accepted the first offer on the first day of viewing, despiteit offering very littleprofit. Also confirms the participants know how much their houses sell for before they are told again for tge benefit of TV.


    Quite surprised C4 haven't put this in full on All4. As much as that annoys me at times it is a show more suited to binge watching than a Kirsty and Phil series.

    I think it's a good idea for a show, but it needs quite a few blips ironed out of it.
    There's too many teams to focus on, which means they aren't with several teams each week.
Sign In or Register to comment.