Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

EU food-system transition requires innovative policy analysis methods

Governing food-system transitions requires innovation in the study of impacts and futures. Current approaches to impact assessment require greater complexity in systems modelling and complementation with alternative mechanisms to overcome limitations in scoping, conceptual assumptions and methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Schebesta, H. & Candel, J. J. L. Nat. Food 1, 586–588 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beckman, J., Ivanic, M., Jelliffe, J. L., Baquedano, F. G. & Scott, S. G. Economic and Food Security Impacts of Agricultural Input Reduction Under the European Union Green Deal’s Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies (United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2020).

  3. Henning, C., Witzke, P., Panknin, L. & Grunenberg, M. Ökonomische und Ökologische Auswirkungen des Green Deals in der Agrarwirtschaft (Christian-Albrechts-Universität, 2021).

  4. Barreiro-Hurle, J. et al. Modelling Environmental and Climate Ambition in the Agricultural Sector with the CAPRI Model (Publications Office of the European Union, 2021).

  5. Bremmer, J. et al. Impact Assessment of EC 2030 Green Deal Targets for Sustainable Crop Production (Wageningen Economic Research, 2021).

  6. Matthews, A. Bio-based Appl. Econ. 10, 185–205 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Green Deal Targets for 2030 and Agricultural Production Studies (European Commission, 2021).

  8. Reinhardt, T. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13246 (2022).

  9. Richard, G., Le Mouël, C., Thomas, A., Bureau, J.-C. & Guyomard, H. Findings and limitations of the USDA-ERS study: Economic and Food Security Impacts of Agricultural Input Reduction under the European Union Green Deal’s Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies (INRAe, 2020); https://go.nature.com/3rQ3sB9

  10. Geels, F. W. in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.587 (2018).

  11. Velly, G. L. & Dutilly, C. PLoS ONE 11, e0149374 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson, P. et al. A Sustainable Food System for the European Union (SAPEA, 2020).

  13. König, L. M. & Araújo-Soares, V. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13220 (2021).

  14. Aubert, P.-M. & Poux, X. The Farm to Fork strategy: an ambitious and realistic innovation pathway for the European food system. IDDRI https://go.nature.com/3vF9kOI (2021).

  15. Jackson, P. et al. Nat. Food 2, 132–134 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barreiro-Hurle, J. et al. EuroChoices 20, 12–20 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazzucato, M. Ind. Innov. 23, 140–156 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raworth, K. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist (Chelsea Green Publishing, 2017).

  19. Lang, D. J. et al. Sustain. Sci. 7, 25–43 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adelle, C. Polit. Gov. 7, 214–223 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank A. Matthews for helpful comments on a previous draft of this commentary and the Brussels Institute for Advanced Studies for hosting me while working on this commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen Candel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.C. is a member of Dutch Council on Animal Affairs and member of the supervisory board of the Transitiecoalitie Voedsel foundation.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Food thanks Christian Henning and Jayson Beckman for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Candel, J. EU food-system transition requires innovative policy analysis methods. Nat Food 3, 296–298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00518-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00518-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing