You can’t fix everything in one offseason, and it’s clear which weakness the New York Jets have decided they’re willing to live with
The New York Jets have made a bevy of changes to their roster going into the 2022 season. Most positions on the depth chart appear to have been upgraded.
But when you’re coming off a four-win season (and a two-win season before that), it’s impossible to fix everything in the matter of one year.
Rebuilding teams have to kick the can down the road in some areas, accepting that they will struggle there in the short term until they get the chance to prioritize upgrading the position in the future. Resources to improve the roster are limited; teams must choose something to punt on.
As the Jets’ roster stands today (May 20), it’s clear which facet of the game they have elected to deprioritize for the time being: their interior run defense.
Defending runs up the middle will likely be a major problem for the Jets in 2022
Stopping the run was a major issue for the Jets last season. They allowed the most rushing touchdowns in the NFL (28) while ranking 29th in rushing yards per game allowed (138.3) and 26th in rush defense DVOA.
The Jets’ cornerbacks and safeties played a big role in those woes last year. However, the run-stopping woes in the secondary were addressed in a huge way. Newly-added defensive backs Sauce Gardner, D.J. Reed, and Jordan Whitehead are all known as excellent run defenders. There seems to be a bright future for the second level of the Jets’ run defense.
Things are not looking as good for the interior of the Jets’ run defense. In fact, this part of the unit might be even worse than it was last year.
New York lost its interior run-stopping specialist, Foley Fatukasi, to the Jaguars in free agency. Fatukasi wasn’t a great scheme fit in the Jets’ attacking 4-3 defense and saw his performance dip as a result, so New York was wise to let him walk for the lofty price tag of three-years/$30 million. The problem is that the Jets have not done anything to replace him; a player who was one of their only good run defenders.
At the moment, the only defensive tackle added to the Jets’ roster this offseason has been Solomon Thomas. The former Raider is a solid interior pass-rusher but struggles immensely as an interior run defender. Thomas had the second-worst run-defense grade (28.1) among qualified interior defensive linemen at Pro Football Focus in 2021.
Outside of two-way stud Quinnen Williams, the Jets’ defensive tackle unit is loaded with athletic pass-rushers who are below-average against the run.
Sheldon Rankins, Nathan Shepherd, and Jonathan Marshall all fit this bill. John Franklin-Myers is much more prolific than those players in both phases of the game, boasting elite-level ability as an interior pass-rusher, but is still only average at best as a run defender when playing on the inside.
Letting Fatukasi go was a financially responsible decision and I do not think the Jets should have brought him back at his price tag. That was the correct call.
But even if Fatuaski was not quite good enough to warrant his contract in this scheme, he was still a positive-impact run defender, so the Jets are worse on paper without him until they find a similarly-skilled run defender who is also a better scheme fit. They have yet to find that replacement.
Perhaps it happens next year; again, you can’t fix everything in one offseason. The Jets likely decided they would rather upgrade more important positions in 2022 and push this one to 2023 when it can be near the top of their priority list.
Ideally, New York wins out in the long run by making use of the immediate cap space benefits afforded by letting Fatukasi go (his exodus likely paved the way for one big free agent signing like D.J. Reed or Laken Tomlinson) and then replacing him at some point down the line. Unfortunately, in the short term, they’re biting the bullet when it comes to interior run defense.
We haven’t even gotten to the linebackers yet.
Save for C.J. Mosley, the Jets’ linebackers were a mess in the run game last year. And, just like defensive tackle, the Jets have done almost nothing to address the weakness.
The only veteran linebacker added to New York’s roster this offseason has been Marcell Harris, a converted safety who brings some range and coverage ability but is undersized and struggles against the run. The Jets also did not select any linebackers in the draft.
Harris is joined on New York’s roster by a trio of linebackers with a similar profile (athletic but undersized and unproven with poor run defense): Quincy Williams, Jamien Sherwood, and Hamsah Nasirildeen. The latter two are also converted safeties like Harris.
Barring some incredible progression by Williams (a fourth-year player), Sherwood (a fifth-round pick), or Nasirildeen (a sixth-round pick), it looks like Mosley will once again be forced to bear the burden of trying to hold together a fledgling linebacker unit. We also have to start wondering how much is left in the tank for Mosley, who will turn 30 this year.
It appears the Jets are trying to supplement these units. On May 11, it was reported that the Jets are interested in free agents Larry Ogunjobi (defensive tackle, Bengals) and Kwon Alexander (linebacker, Saints).
Ogunjobi and Alexander are well-known, accomplished players, but here’s the problem in regards to the topic of this article: Ogunjobi and Alexander are not good run defenders. Each player is a mirror image of the Jets’ current strengths and weaknesses at their respective positions.
In Ogunjobi, you get an explosive lineman who makes noise as a pass rusher and gets some tackles for loss in the run game at the cost of frequently overrunning plays and missing tackles. Ogunjobi would fit right into the Jets’ attacking 4-3 scheme and give them yet another great pass-rushing weapon. He’s not improving the run defense, though.
In Alexander, you get another athletic linebacker on the small side. Alexander would greatly improve the Jets’ pass coverage at linebacker, but against the run, he would not change much.
It seems likely the Jets are going to have a lot of problems at stopping runs that are directed in between the tackles. Neither the defensive tackle position nor the linebacker position appears to be any better in the run game than they were in 2021.
And maybe that’s okay.
This is the poison the Jets have picked, and it’s probably the best one to choose
As we’ve discussed, no four-win team should be expected to plug every hole in one offseason. Poisons must be picked.
The Jets had to choose some holes to punt into 2023. It’s clear that the linebacker position and the run-stuffing defensive tackle role were the two primary weaknesses that New York felt the most comfortable about dealing with for the time being.
When you look at the big picture, it makes a lot of sense to choose these two positions as the ones to punt. When you work your way down the list of priorities for an NFL roster, these two spots are likely at the bottom.
It all starts at quarterback. It then goes to supporting the quarterback. From there, it’s about affecting the quarterback defensively.
The Jets have beautifully adhered to those priorities.
They got their quarterback in 2021, of course. Since then, they have focused heavily on supporting him, making a plethora of additions at offensive line, wide receiver, tight end, and running back (prioritizing them in that order, which seems to be the proper way to rank them).
Defensively, they have focused on pass-rushing more than anything, looking to place pressure on the many deadly quarterbacks in the AFC. This year, they moved their focus outside to the cornerback spot, aiming to keep up with the superstar wide receivers offered by their division rivals.
Pass-rushing and coverage at cornerback are the two facets of defense that have the most direct impact on the quarterback.
Stopping the run absolutely matters, but it does not matter more than any of the things we just mentioned. That comes last.
Once you have a great quarterback, a great system around the quarterback, and great defensive weapons who can make the other quarterback’s life a living hell, then you can focus on your run defense.
I applaud general manager Joe Douglas for his approach to roster construction. His priorities are in the right place. Few things make that more clear than his decisions on which positions were the best ones to kick down the road. It’s a signal of how prudent his resource allocation was throughout the 2022 offseason.
The Jets are going to suffer this season when it comes to stopping the run, specifically on the interior, and I’m sure the team knows that. But it’s a small price to pay in exchange for the massive steps forward that the Jets were able to take in more important parts of the game.
Look for New York to struggle at defending runs between the tackles in 2022 before focusing heavily on linebackers and run-stuffing defensive tackles in the 2023 offseason.
Audio Version available to members only: Learn more here
Want More NY Jets News & Jets X-Factor Content?
Download the free Jet X Mobile App to get customizable notifications directly to your iOS (App Store) or Google/Android (Google Play) device.
Add Jets X-Factor to your Google News feed to stay up to date with the New York Jets.
Follow us on Twitter @jetsxfactor for all the latest New York Jets news, Facebook for even more, Instagram for some of the top NY Jets images, and YouTube for original Jets X-Factor videos.
Join the official Jets Discord community to connect with likeminded fans.
This may be a retro point of view, but I still think both being able to defend against the run and run the ball are NOT low priorities but essentials, like a foundation is to a house. It may not be what you show your guests right away, like your living room or your deck, but if you don’t have a sound foundation, you really have nothing. The Rex Ryan and Todd Bowles regimes seemed to believe in this, and their defenses were a damned sight better than the Saleh/Ulbrich product. There is nothing worse than getting gashed on the ground repeatedly on third or fourth and long and being unable to get the defense off the field. Maybe the Jets worst defeat last year was to the Colts, a good but not great team, that totally demolished the Jets D-line and ran over them all game long. Also, if I recall correctly, it was after that game or another that the Jets got gashed on the ground that Ulbrich said how it “hurts the soul” for a defense to be beaten like that. It may not show up in the statistics, or conform to modern offensive strategy, but a football team just can’t be weak against the run and still hope to compete, much less earn the respect they never got last year, in my opinion.
That’s a very fair take. We’ll see if they can survive with their current makeup of elite pass-rushing and questionable run defense.
I always looked at this as a 2 year project after a great 2021 draft. I thought we would get closer but need another offseason of free agency and draft to become a consistent playoff contender.
As the draft turned to round 4 I began to feel we are alot closer than I could have expected.
So much so if I were sitting in Joe Douglas’ seat if Seattle would have traded picks 40/41 I would have been willing to trade the 2023 1st rounder for those 2. (pick 17 is break even according to the point chart.
Despite some injury that set these guys back I would have taken David Ojabo and Nakobe Dean both LB that would help in the run game and pass rush.
Who knows if Seattle had any interest, but as the draft went on I became more and more greedy to pick up more talent that could mature earlier and close most holes.
Lots of great discussion here, so here is my $0.02, sorry if some is repetitive. Your points are valid however I think the biggest challenge here is scheme. When you instruct your DL to get to the QB at all costs you are exposed to up the middle runs and swing passes. A recipe for disaster with the LB group the Jets’ have. Foley is a good player but not a good player in this system, both can be true. The team was 29th in run D with him on the roster, I doubt it would be a major improvement to keep him. This coaching staff loves the “safety turned LB” which means small and subject to manhandling, which is what we saw last year. They seem to be committed to it and here’s why I think they are…..
One thing not mentioned is the atrocious offense the Jets put on the field. When NFL teams have big leads and are playing ahead they run the ball. The Jets’ offense put no pressure on opposing teams to score points. If things go as planned it will be a lot tougher for opponents to stick with the run game if the Jets’ offense is putting up 24 points or more per game. It will be tougher for teams to stick with a run game if they are playing from behind.
I agree the run D remains a problem both because I don’t think the Jets’ have the complete personnel package to run their system yet but they seem to have improved enough to minimize that weakness. I do believe they need some beef for goaline etc and I suspect they will add someone once they have an opportunity to see how this group gels.
The scheme definitely sacrifices some run defense in exchange for pass rushing. Good trade-off if it helps you get an elite pass rush (the Niners were not great at stopping the run in 2019 for example) but it certainly puts high stress on that pass rush to make up for the run game. I think you can still field a good run defense if you have the right guys – athletic, run-game-minded DTs to rotate in at the right times, plus good LBs – but they don’t have them right now, so we’ll see what they do to try and tread water this year.
Better offense will certainly help. Teams were able to get their ground games going against the Jets last year because they were always leading and could run the entire game. Pats (W2) and Saints come to mind. Jets held the Patriots fairly well in the beginning but eventually caved in and started missing tackles as the game moved on and the defense got no rest. Saints game was a low-scoring affair until, again, the defense caved late after being on the field the whole game.
On the surface the premise of the article is on point, and if accurate could very well be exposed early by Baltimore and Cleveland’s commitment to the run game. That said, it seemed to me their run defense woes were improving by the last quarter of last year. Would love to see their stats post the Colts game. Aside from their horrid rash of injuries, I found that the team started to get the schemes better in the 2nd half of the year. If the stats bear that out, it would be consistent with the learning curve of new scheme, coaching and young players.
I don’t think they got much better unfortunately, here’s their comparison through the Colts game and then after
First 8 games: 133.3 YPG, 4.6 YPC, 15 TD
Last 9 games: 142.8 YPG, 4.4 YPC, 13 TD
(league averages in 2021 were 115.2 YPG, 4.3 YPC, and 0.93 TDs/G)
Had a great game stopping the run against the Bucs in Week 17 (very impressive considering their OL talent) but also got shredded by the Eagles, Saints, Dolphins, and Bills (all going for 170+)
Thanks for posting Michael. Much appreciated. Not good stats at all. As fans we need to bank on better scheme familiarity and improved personnel.
The other dynamic is hopefully playing with more leads to force teams to throw against hopefully an improved pass rush.
Just did a piece on their improved zone coverage, which touches on how I think it will benefit their pass-rush and the creation of more third-and-longs. This can all have a domino effect that helps the run defense, too. If the Jets’ coverage is good enough, perhaps they can get more aggressive at bringing the safeties down/loading up the box to make up for their weaknesses against the run.
Good point, they need a quality run-stopper at nose tackle otherwise, they will have to sell out to slow down the running game. Hope they can find one from another team! Just extend This season!
Enjoyed your article but there’s a great deal of contradiction with Fatukasi. The best run defender on the team / Top 5 in the NFL and he wasn’t worth the money? I totally disagree with you on this one $20 million guaranteed over 3 years to contain the run is a small price to pay, especially when you don’t have anyone and it helps Mosley. A 4-3 is designed to be a balanced defense if a run stuffer is not made for your defense then theres something wrong with your scheme. The Jets have a line full of potential sack guys that cant tackle. Nah our head coach get thumbs down on run defense. The scheme to stop the run is a poor scheme. Everything is not about sacks. Don’t blame fatukasi he did his job.
Great points. I definitely think the run defense is the number one point of criticism for Saleh and Ulbrich right now. There’s a lot of stagnation and stubbornness with how they operated the DL last year and schemed to stop the run. We’ll see if they can adjust going forward. It’s great to focus on rushing the passer but they were aggressive to a fault last year and never adjusted to stop getting burned by draw plays/delayed handoffs.
As for Fatukasi, while I think he was still good last year, I think he dropped down from the top-5 level he was certainly at from 2019-20. They changed his role significantly compared to how he was used under Gregg Williams and I think he was not as dominant as he used to be. In 2020 under Williams he lined up over the center on 36% of his snaps, in 2021 that dropped to 16%. His percentage of snaps over the guard rose from 53% to 73%. In turn his run-defense grade at Pro Football Focus dropped from 86.2 in 2020 (2nd out of 71 qualified interior linemen) to 57.3 in 2021 (30th out of 63; so still top-half but barely).
PFF grades are not gospel and can be way off the mark at times, but based on what I saw on film, I feel like this estimation is accurate (maybe a bit harsh on the severity of the drop-off but I do agree that a significant drop-off was there). I think it’s clear that he’s at his best when anchoring down against the center and clogging the A-gaps with a two-gapping mentality, but in this defense, he doesn’t get to do that as much since the scheme doesn’t employ a pure nose tackle (over the center) as often.
So he spent a lot more time playing 2i/3-tech with a one-gapping mentality, trying to attack and explode off the ball, and that didn’t suit him as well. While he still made a lot of great plays on the ball, he got moved around more easily than he had in the past. Previously, he was a brick wall who clogged the lane and had a huge impact in allowing teammates to rally for tackles. This year, opposing offensive linemen had their way with him at times, creating some lateral movement on outside runs.
The scheme doesn’t emphasize his strengths, which are holding his ground in the A-gaps, reading the play, and shedding to make great stops. It instead decreases his snaps in that role and asks him to play more snaps lined up further outside in which he is asked to play more aggressively (one-gapping), whereas I think his strength is playing conservatively (two-gapping).
I think he definitely deserves the deal he received if he’s in the right scheme but personally I don’t think he’d play up to that contract in this particular defense. In Jacksonville, his DC is Mike Caldwell, who is a longtime Todd Bowles disciple. Caldwell was with the Jets (as a LB coach) when Fatukasi was drafted in 2018. Bowles is obviously a 3-4 coach, so I assume Caldwell will carry that over, and if so, it’s a perfect fit for Fatukasi. I think he’ll do great there. He’s probably the best signing Jacksonville made this offseason.
I definitely agree with your analogy and knowledge on the topic and you hit a great point when you said stubborn. The amazing situation about clogging the A Gap and taking on 2 defenders is freeing up a LB or DE with the right scheme. The Jets are very good (On purpose) at decreasing value by changing responsibilities or positions based on fatukasi stats from year to year his value decrease as his responsibilities changed. This has been something that plague the Jets when free agency comes around. Dont tell me what a player cant do tell me what a player can do. It makes no sense to constantly play a 4-2-5 in running situations.
Agreed, I want to see more malleability out of Saleh and Ulbrich this year on defense. I know they have more talent to work with at Edge and CB that should help them better run the base defense they want to primarily operate out of, but this defense is still filled with weaknesses and is also very young. There will be times when they face a bad matchup and will get burnt if they do not adjust. I really liked the adjustments LaFleur made throughout the season on the offensive side but we didn’t see enough of that defensively. To be fair, there wasn’t much they could have done with how many injuries they had to deal with and the overall lack of talent, but now that they possess more talent, they’ll have more options. Let’s see Saleh/Ulbrich explore them.
The Ravens will be an interesting test. Can Baltimore run the ball on the Jets, and stop the Jets from running the ball. Great indicator on how the season will go
Why use a 4th round pick to take a developmental player like Micheal Clemons who’s going to fight for snaps on the depth chart vs. an interior DL or LB who fills an immediate hole and who can start?
Nice article Michael, and I enjoyed reading it. Do you think you could’ve gone on to include some objective evidence of how the value of running the football, just in general, “does not matter more than any of the things we just mentioned?”
I read an article a couple of months back that used analytics that showed the best running teams (in 2020, I guess) actually scored less than would be expected simply because they chose to run the ball too much. I mean, I think that analysis probably has some holes, as they probably also dominated TOP, which means their opponents scored less than expected, too…or what does less than expected even mean? I wish I could point you to the article, but I can’t.
I was more so going off the idea that the pass/run ratio continuously goes up while the league becomes increasingly more offense-friendly within the rules – so passing > running (due to higher volume of passes in addition to the greater value of those plays due to more yards/TDs/first downs per play) and offense > defense – but I know there are some good studies on it. I’ll see if I can dig one up. If you can find that one you were talking about I think that would be very interesting to check out.