Options

EastEnders storylines that should never have happened?

OwenFowler48OwenFowler48 Posts: 236
Forum Member
I’m interested to see what storylines people thought were awful and should never happened. I think Ian and Sharon’s marriage was the the worst personality, very poor decision.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    dancer_boydancer_boy Posts: 386
    Forum Member
    Pat...nuff said
  • Options
    MaxcidentMaxcident Posts: 7,270
    Forum Member
    I’m interested to see what storylines people thought were awful and should never happened. I think Ian and Sharon’s marriage was the the worst personality, very poor decision.

    I would’ve liked the aftermath of Denny’s death, whereby the truth was revealed to Sharon, resulting in a three-hander episode between Phil, Ian and Sharon, whereby they aired all their grievances, as opposed to Lady Macbeth, cooking up a storm, laced with arsenic, in the kitchen, and of course, Sharon Beale was such an awful plot twist, especially, seeing as her true intentions were blindingly obvious.
  • Options
    laceydawsonlaceydawson Posts: 3,678
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Gray's serial killer storyline is the obvious one that springs to mind.
    The Ruby/Stacey feud was utter tripe. Louisa Lytton managed to elevate it above the level that the script deserved to be at, but only just.
    Chelsea/Denise/Lucas drugs storyline at the beginning of the year was complete garbage, barely saved by a few decent performances by Don Gilet.

    Who Killed Archie. It wrote Stacey into a corner and made her really bloody unlikeable, whilst forcing other characters (cough, Max, cough) to go to absolutely ridiculous lengths to ensure she never had to pay for her crime. When you've got to the point where a father is perfectly happy for the whole community to be calling his son a murderer whilst knowing full well he is innocent, you know something has gone horribly wrong.
  • Options
    MR_PitkinMR_Pitkin Posts: 30,781
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Anything from the last 10 years🤟
  • Options
    Emeraldbay72Emeraldbay72 Posts: 901
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Gray's serial killer storyline is the obvious one that springs to mind.
    The Ruby/Stacey feud was utter tripe. Louisa Lytton managed to elevate it above the level that the script deserved to be at, but only just.
    Chelsea/Denise/Lucas drugs storyline at the beginning of the year was complete garbage, barely saved by a few decent performances by Don Gilet.

    Who Killed Archie. It wrote Stacey into a corner and made her really bloody unlikeable, whilst forcing other characters (cough, Max, cough) to go to absolutely ridiculous lengths to ensure she never had to pay for her crime. When you've got to the point where a father is perfectly happy for the whole community to be calling his son a murderer whilst knowing full well he is innocent, you know something has gone horribly wrong.

    I agree about the Gray storyline...they should have kept it as a domestic abuse storyline instead of making it into this serial killer farce! The domestic abuse story with Chantelle was really good then they ruined it...
  • Options
    Polly_PerkinsPolly_Perkins Posts: 21,740
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So many, anything that impacted future proofing of the show, pointlessly stifled potential or sold out the core fanbase.

    Could start with off screen revenge deaths such as Angie and Cindy.

    The totally pointless and short sighted death of Pat.

    Killing off both Mitchell sisters, an established family that was massacred.

    The deaths of Ian's kids, although I'm on the fence with Lucy as it was such a great story.

    The weird path they took Max down and killing off Abi.

    Shifting the focus away from relatable characters and family, with a unique gritty vibe into a soap that could be set anywhere.

    Sharon's kid being killed and Sharon going all weird with Ian.

    Sharon discovering her birth father called her Princess and all that retcon stuff.

    I could go on......
  • Options
    pc1985pc1985 Posts: 875
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Kathy & Phil having a child together
  • Options
    Tanya1982Tanya1982 Posts: 17,444
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    edited 25/01/22 - 19:10 #9
    Remorseless people trafficking from a long term character we are apparently meant to find sympathetic, as some kind of loveable rogue/bad boy with a heart. It would be interesting to see what Pam and Kathy would make of that news.

    'Who shagged Kat' - considering her history as known to viewers, even more of a retrograde festival of joyless misogyny than it would've been anyway. Lumbering the character with her youngest two sons wasn't an improvement.

    Killing off Pat, Denny, Mel/Hunter, and Kush were all hugely counterproductive and destructive. Not killing off Alfie Moon, offscreen, was a mistake - the vague threat of a return for any purpose is a dark shadow across my soul.
  • Options
    Wheeler2Wheeler2 Posts: 613
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Gray becoming a serial killer .

    It was a hard hitting. Realistic storyline , on domestic abuse . They’ve turned it into a circus , it’s dragged on far too long , is borderlining on ridiculous.
  • Options
    solostarsolostar Posts: 9,505
    Forum Member
    Jay and Honey. It's absolutely sickening.
  • Options
    hallchallc Posts: 200,555
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Max and Linda ......
  • Options
    Mindy-MooMindy-Moo Posts: 20,469
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Max and the Weyland nonsense
  • Options
    Joey15811Joey15811 Posts: 15,426
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Human Trafficking. That needs new disposable characters introducing for specifically for the storyline. Not involve on one of the shows main families.

    Jay and Honey

    Mo stealing from the Allotments when she got made to a recurring character.

    Sharon marrying and then poisoning Ian.

    Make Gray a killer at all and should have gone down the therapy route.

    Shaneu.

    Bring in Dexter’s dad at all let alone the kidney storyline.

    The Vi secret son story.

    Max and Linda

    Hayley/Alfie

    Keep Alfie alive.

    All of the storylines involving Billy since 2015ish. He needed axing but atleast that late we’d still have Lola and Lexi.

    Ted’s rushed exit

    Iqra’s exit

    Habbiba’s exit




  • Options
    Tanya1982Tanya1982 Posts: 17,444
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    There will doubtless be examples which lots of others feel passionately about, that I actually don't care about, or actively think were/are for the best. Among these, I'd include the following...

    Killing Ronnie and Roxy. It was unexpected and quite graphic. Maybe Roxy had mileage for more. It's done now, get over it. There probably wasn't much more Ronnie related misery either the viewers or Samantha Janus could've taken anyway.

    Killing Abi. A miserable faced irritant and complete weirdo. From her mother to her sister to her dads girlfriends, the tale of a jealous frump embittered to the point of insanity by more popular women only needed to be told once. No interest.

    Serial Killer Gray. I don't find it offensive. He was a domestic abuser, and something else too. Serial killers have to start somewhere regarding the first kill. I don't find it out of the ballpark that a very manipulative domestic abuser would go further.

    I don't mind being in a minority of one. From thinking Gray was a bland pretty boy, and then suffering through the grim abuse storyline/public service scenes, suddenly he became gloriously bonkers. It's now one of my favourite current trajectories.

    At the time, I loved seeing Cindy just make the Eurostar - and the next year in Italy. I'd rather Ian had failed to find her, and she was still out there, with two Italian raised sons. I don't want her back, I just wish the Italy stuff had led in that direction.
  • Options
    Joey15811Joey15811 Posts: 15,426
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Killing of Hunter. I feel given Mel and Steve were iconic and popular characters, their only kid should live and carry on the legacy for the show.

    Killing of Abi

    Killing of Steven

    Killing of Roxy

    Killing off Pat when she just wanted an extended break.

    Sam’s 2009 return.

  • Options
    Tanya1982Tanya1982 Posts: 17,444
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    So actually, I do agree that Cindy shouldn't have been killed off. She'd have come into her own when Lucy was killed - I can easily envisage Lucy going to find her mother when she was old enough, finding her less ideal in person than as an image she had, and ending up back in London in a mess, ready to meet her destiny with a jewellery box.

    The presence of two sophisticated Anglo Italian actors, who'd grown up entirely with Cindy, would've livened the Beales up over the years - more interesting than meat free Monday storylines, or all the farfetched nonsense with Steven shooting his barren stepmother in the womb, before returning to impregnate the local bunny boiler.
  • Options
    BadLadAshBadLadAsh Posts: 28,493
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    edited 25/01/22 - 19:48 #18
    Kat's secret son/redwater
    Killing off R&R
    Killing off Hev
    Killing off Denny
    Doing a repeat of Bradley falling off the roof with Abi & Lauren, I don't care that Abi is dead but it's completely ludicrous
  • Options
    laceydawsonlaceydawson Posts: 3,678
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Tanya1982 wrote: »
    Remorseless people trafficking from a long term character we are apparently meant to find sympathetic, as some kind of loveable rogue/bad boy with a heart. It would be interesting to see what Pam and Kathy would make of that news.

    'Who shagged Kat' - considering her history as known to viewers, even more of a retrograde festival of joyless misogyny than it would've been anyway. Lumbering the character with her youngest two sons wasn't an improvement.

    Killing off Pat, Denny, Mel/Hunter, and Kush were all hugely counterproductive and destructive. Not killing off Alfie Moon, offscreen, was a mistake - the vague threat of a return for any purpose is a dark shadow across my soul.

    I'd forgotten the human trafficking debacle. 2019 was just a complete disaster for Ben, what with that and sexually harassing Callum for months on end, before promptly dumping him five minutes after he'd left Whitney for Ben.

    Who Battered Beale is another one - I predicted absolutely right that we would be expected to sympathise with Ian's attackers and want them to get away scot free.

    That godawful storyline just after lockdown where Suki upped the rent on the Slater house, so Kat decided to team up with Phil to steal classic cars from a warehouse in order to pay it. The fact that Ballum relationship drama was bundled into the episodes made me realise we were actually supposed to be taking this nonsense seriously.
  • Options
    laceydawsonlaceydawson Posts: 3,678
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Joey15811 wrote: »
    Killing of Hunter. I feel given Mel and Steve were iconic and popular characters, their only kid should live and carry on the legacy for the show.

    Killing of Abi

    Killing of Steven

    Killing of Roxy

    Killing off Pat when she just wanted an extended break.

    Sam’s 2009 return.

    Steven! Where everyone forgot about his death five minutes later.
  • Options
    **Ulster_Girl****Ulster_Girl** Posts: 1,010
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As well as those previously mentioned, the baby swap storyline, Gavin Sullivan and the return of the Wilmot-Brown clan. Sorry I'd forgotten the name the children took on for the return.

    Oh, and poor Fatboy 😪
  • Options
    QueenshazzaQueenshazza Posts: 2,519
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sharon Beale. ‘Nuff said
  • Options
    Tanya1982Tanya1982 Posts: 17,444
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    edited 25/01/22 - 19:58 #23
    Tanya1982 wrote: »
    Remorseless people trafficking from a long term character we are apparently meant to find sympathetic, as some kind of loveable rogue/bad boy with a heart. It would be interesting to see what Pam and Kathy would make of that news.

    'Who shagged Kat' - considering her history as known to viewers, even more of a retrograde festival of joyless misogyny than it would've been anyway. Lumbering the character with her youngest two sons wasn't an improvement.

    Killing off Pat, Denny, Mel/Hunter, and Kush were all hugely counterproductive and destructive. Not killing off Alfie Moon, offscreen, was a mistake - the vague threat of a return for any purpose is a dark shadow across my soul.

    I'd forgotten the human trafficking debacle. 2019 was just a complete disaster for Ben, what with that and sexually harassing Callum for months on end, before promptly dumping him five minutes after he'd left Whitney for Ben.

    Who Battered Beale is another one - I predicted absolutely right that we would be expected to sympathise with Ian's attackers and want them to get away scot free.

    That godawful storyline just after lockdown where Suki upped the rent on the Slater house, so Kat decided to team up with Phil to steal classic cars from a warehouse in order to pay it. The fact that Ballum relationship drama was bundled into the episodes made me realise we were actually supposed to be taking this nonsense seriously.

    I must admit I did. It would've been a case of 'yes officer, I was sitting on this bench right outside but I didn't see a soul until you arrived - and before you ask me if I heard anything, I can only say I'd been thinking it was a remarkably quiet evening'.
  • Options
    Joey15811Joey15811 Posts: 15,426
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Tanya1982 wrote: »
    So actually, I do agree that Cindy shouldn't have been killed off. She'd have come into her own when Lucy was killed - I can easily envisage Lucy going to find her mother when she was old enough, finding her less ideal in person than as an image she had, and ending up back in London in a mess, ready to meet her destiny with a jewellery box.

    The presence of two sophisticated Anglo Italian actors, who'd grown up entirely with Cindy, would've livened the Beales up over the years - more interesting than meat free Monday storylines, or all the farfetched nonsense with Steven shooting his barren stepmother in the womb, before returning to impregnate the local bunny boiler.

    Oh yeah Cindy’s death being another one. People really want her back and I don’t get why. But circumstances of how she died, I’m Switching off if they bring her back. .
  • Options
    Red-EyeRed-Eye Posts: 8,509
    Forum Member
    edited 25/01/22 - 20:18 #25
    Unpopular opinion but the whole "Who Killed Lucy?" Saga.

    The aftermath alone caused so much long-term damage IMHO which really left a bad taste in my mouth.

    To this day I still loathe Weasel Ian and the Blessed Saint Jane as a result of it and always will no matter how desperately TPTB tried hard to try and continue to portray those 2 as the non-villain "goody characters".🙄

    I don't even feel bad whenever anything horrible happens to them because as far as I'm concerned they deserved it and much worse.

    Don't even give a toss about how crappy their exits were either.

    I'd add Ben The Human Trafficker and Serial-Killer Gray too but others have already articulated perfectly exactly what's wrong with those so no need to add to those further. :)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    Forum Member
    edited 25/01/22 - 21:59 #26
    For me Ronnie and Roxy's death was one of the worst things to have happened on EE. Also Jean's man dying from cancer. These two were great together, Pity they killed him off.
    Derek Branning, Kirsty Branning, Tanya Lauren and Abi. they should all still be in it.
    Hayley and Alfie should be in it as well.
    What happened to Mo? She just seemed to disappear?
    Chantelle's death. Kush's death and Tina's.
Sign In or Register to comment.