Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02117-1, published online 23 November 2021


The original version of this Article contained errors.


In Table 2, subheadings “Alpha. Formula”, “Sigma. Formula” and “Beta. Formula” were incorrectly given as “Theta. Formula”.


Incorrect:

Theta. Formula: alpha ~ s(age) + s(weight) + ti(age,weight)

Parametric coefficients

Estimate

SE

t

p

Intercept

0.587

0.048

12.13

< 0.001

Theta. Formula: alpha ~ s(age) + s(weight) + ti(age,weight)

Parametric coefficients

Estimate

SE

t

P

Intercept

− 0.278

0.064

− 4.345

< 0.001

Theta. Formula: beta ~ s(age) + s(weight) + ti(age,weight)

Parametric coefficients

Estimate

SE

t

p

Intercept

− 0.0379

0.079

− 0.477

0.635


Correct:

Alpha. Formula: alpha ~ s(age) + s(weight) + ti(age, weight)

Parametric coefficients

Estimate

SE

t

p

Intercept

0.587

0.048

12.13

< 0.001

Sigma. Formula: sigma ~ s(age) + s(weight) + ti(age, weight)

Parametric coefficients

Estimate

SE

t

p

Intercept

− 0.278

0.064

− 4.345

< 0.001

Beta. Formula: beta ~ s(age) + s(weight) + ti(age, weight)

Parametric coefficients

Estimate

SE

t

p

Intercept

− 0.0379

0.079

− 0.477

0.635


Additionally, in the section “Future directions and limitations”,


“This is similar to humans, where neuromaturation continues well into “young adulthood”, with gray/white matter changes continuing beyond the age of 1872 and white matter developing into the late 1920s73, despite the commonly accepted 18-year cutoff of adulthood72,73.”


now reads:


“This is similar to humans, where neuromaturation continues well into “young adulthood”, with gray/white matter changes continuing beyond the age of 1872 and white matter developing into the late 20s73, despite the commonly accepted 18-year cutoff of adulthood72,73.”


The original Article has been corrected.