Abstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) provides a promising solution for sharing information-theoretic secure keys between remote peers with physics-based protocols. According to the law of quantum physics, the photons carrying signals cannot be amplified or relayed via classical optical techniques to maintain quantum security. As a result, the transmission loss of the channel limits its achievable distance, and this has been a huge barrier towards building large-scale quantum-secure networks. Here we present an experimental QKD system that could tolerate a channel loss beyond 140 dB and obtain a secure distance of 833.8 km, setting a new record for fibre-based QKD. Furthermore, the optimized four-phase twin-field protocol and high-quality set-up make its secure key rate more than two orders of magnitude greater than previous records over similar distances. Our results mark a breakthrough towards building reliable and efficient terrestrial quantum-secure networks over a scale of 1,000 km.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information. Source data are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing 175–179 (IEEE, 1984).
Pirandola, S. et al. Advances in quantum cryptography. Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 1012–1236 (2020).
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K. & Pan, J.-W. Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025002 (2020).
Wang, S. et al. 2-GHz clock quantum key distribution over 260 km of standard telecom fiber. Opt. Lett. 37, 1008–1010 (2012).
Korzh, B. et al. Provably secure and practical quantum key distribution over 307 km of optical fibre. Nat. Photon. 9, 163–168 (2015).
Yin, H.-L. et al. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over a 404-km optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190501 (2016).
Boaron, A. et al. Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 190502 (2018).
Takeoka, M., Guha, S. & Wilde, M. M. Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution. Nat. Commun. 5, 5235 (2014).
Pirandola, S., Laurenza, R., Ottaviani, C. & Banchi, L. Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications. Nat. Commun. 8, 15043 (2017).
Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F. & Shields, A. J. Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature 557, 400–403 (2018).
Ma, X., Zeng, P. & Zhou, H. Phase-matching quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031043 (2018).
Tamaki, K., Lo, H.-K., Wang, W. & Lucamarini, M. Information theoretic security of quantum key distribution overcoming the repeaterless secret key capacity bound. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.05511 (2018).
Wang, X.-B., Yu, Z.-W. & Hu, X.-L. Twin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error. Phys. Rev. A 98, 062323 (2018).
Lin, J. & Lütkenhaus, N. Simple security analysis of phase-matching measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A 98, 042332 (2018).
Cui, C. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution without phase postselection. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 034053 (2019).
Curty, M., Azuma, K. & Lo, H.-K. Simple security proof of twin-field type quantum key distribution protocol. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 64 (2019).
Grasselli, F. & Curty, M. Practical decoy-state method for twin-field quantum key distribution. N. J. Phys. 21, 073001 (2019).
Jiang, C., Yu, Z.-W., Hu, X.-L. & Wang, X.-B. Unconditional security of sending or not sending twin-field quantum key distribution with finite pulses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 024061 (2019).
Yu, Z.-W., Hu, X.-L., Jiang, C., Xu, H. & Wang, X.-B. Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice. Sci. Rep. 9, 3080 (2019).
Hu, X.-L., Jiang, C., Yu, Z.-W. & Wang, X.-B. Sending-or-not-sending twin-field protocol for quantum key distribution with asymmetric source parameters. Phys. Rev. A 100, 062337 (2019).
Zhou, X.-Y., Zhang, C.-H., Zhang, C.-M. & Wang, Q. Asymmetric sending or not sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice. Phys. Rev. A 99, 062316 (2019).
Maeda, K., Sasaki, T. & Koashi, M. Repeaterless quantum key distribution with efficient finite-key analysis overcoming the rate–distance limit. Nat. Commun. 10, 3140 (2019).
Lu, F.-Y. et al. Improving the performance of twin-field quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A 100, 022306 (2019).
Xu, H., Yu, Z.-W., Jiang, C., Hu, X.-L. & Wang, X.-B. Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution: breaking the direct transmission key rate. Phys. Rev. A 101, 042330 (2020).
Wang, W. & Lo, H.-K. Simple method for asymmetric twin-field quantum key distribution. N. J. Phys. 22, 013020 (2020).
Wang, R. et al. Optimized protocol for twin-field quantum key distribution. Commun. Phys. 3, 149 (2020).
Zeng, P., Wu, W. & Ma, X. Symmetry-protected privacy: beating the rate-distance linear bound over a noisy channel. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 064013 (2020).
Currás-Lorenzo, G. et al. Tight finite-key security for twin-field quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 22 (2021).
Minder, M. et al. Experimental quantum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity. Nat. Photon. 13, 334–338 (2019).
Wang, S. et al. Beating the fundamental rate-distance limit in a proof-of-principle quantum key distribution system. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021046 (2019).
Liu, Y. et al. Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 100505 (2019).
Zhong, X., Hu, J., Curty, M., Qian, L. & Lo, H.-K. Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of twin-field type quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 100506 (2019).
Fang, X.-T. et al. Implementation of quantum key distribution surpassing the linear rate-transmittance bound. Nat. Photon. 14, 422–425 (2020).
Chen, J.-P. et al. Sending-or-not-sending with independent lasers: secure twin-field quantum key distribution over 509 km. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 070501 (2020).
Zhong, X., Wang, W., Qian, L. & Lo, H.-K. Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of twin-field quantum key distribution over optical channels with asymmetric losses. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 8 (2021).
Pittaluga, M. et al. 600-km repeater-like quantum communications with dual-band stabilisation. Nat. Photon. 15, 530–535 (2021).
Clivati, C. et al. Coherent phase transfer for real-world twin-field quantum key distribution. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15199 (2020).
Liu, H. et al. Field test of twin-field quantum key distribution through sending-or-not-sending over 428 km. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 250502 (2021).
Chen, J.-P. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over 511-km optical fiber linking two distant metropolitans. Nat. Photon. 15, 570–575 (2021).
Ma, X. & Razavi, M. Alternative schemes for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A 86, 062319 (2012).
Tamaki, K., Lo, H.-K., Fung, C.-H. F. & Qi, B. Phase encoding schemes for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with basis-dependent flaw. Phys. Rev. A 85, 042307 (2012).
Tamura, Y. et al. The first 0.14-dB/km loss optical fiber and its impact on submarine transmission. J. Light. Technol. 36, 44–49 (2018).
Xiao, H., Lao, X.-G., Shen, Z.-Q. & Zhai, Y.-X. Research on manufacturing process of ultra-low loss optical fiber. Modern Transmission 2019, 73–76 (2019).
Goltsman, G. et al. Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 705–707 (2001).
Smirnov, K., Vachtomin, Y., Divochiy, A., Antipov, A. & Goltsman, G. Dependence of dark count rates in superconducting single photon detectors on the filtering effect of standard single mode optical fibers. Appl. Phys. Express 8, 022501 (2015).
Smirnov, K. et al. NbN single-photon detectors with saturated dependence of quantum efficiency. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31, 035011 (2018).
Woodward, S. & Darcie, T. A method for reducing multipath interference noise. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 6, 450–452 (1994).
Koashi, M. Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity. N. J. Phys. 11, 045018 (2009).
Müller-Quade, J. & Renner, R. Composability in quantum cryptography. N. J. Phys. 11, 085006 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2018YFA0306400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 61622506, 61627820, 61822115, 61875181 and 61675189) and the 111 Project (D20031), and the Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.W., Z.-Q.Y., D.-Y.H. and Wei Chen (University of Science and Technology of China) developed the experimental set-up, performed the measurements and analysed the data. P.Y., G.-J.F.-Y., F.-X.W. and Z.Z. supported the experimental work. R.-Q.W., Y.Z. and Z.-Q.Y. provided the simulations. Wei Chen (Shanghai University & Jiangsu Hengtong Optical Fiber Technology Co. Ltd.) and Y.-G.Z. provided the ultra-low-loss fibres. P.V.M., A.V.D., D.-Y.H. and S.W. designed the low-noise detector. Wei Chen (University of Science and Technology of China), G.-C.G. and Z.-F.H. guided the work. S.W. and Z.-Q.Y. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from all the authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Photonics thanks Marco Lucamarini and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary sections, Figs. 1–7 and Tables 1–3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Yin, ZQ., He, DY. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre. Nat. Photon. 16, 154–161 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00928-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00928-2
This article is cited by
-
Improving the performance of practical phase-matching quantum key distribution with advantage distillation
Quantum Information Processing (2024)
-
Improved security bounds against the Trojan-horse attack in decoy-state quantum key distribution
Quantum Information Processing (2024)
-
Analysis and protection to user privacy in quantum private query with non-ideal light source
Quantum Information Processing (2024)
-
Enhanced Performance of Measurement-device-independent Quantum Key Distribution over Turbulent Channels through Adaptive Optics
Quantum Information Processing (2024)
-
Measurement-device-independent quantum dialogue based on entanglement swapping and phase encoding
Quantum Information Processing (2024)