ED: Could David "become" a Sugden?
javalanche
Posts: 377 Forum Member
✭
Emmerdale has said there will be a new baby born later this year. If this happened to be David and Victoria having a baby together, she may well want the baby to have the Sugden name liks her first child.
If they were ever to marry, what are the chances that David cod take on the same surname as his new wife and child, like Paddy did?
This could be s simple way of expanding the Sugden family.
If they were ever to marry, what are the chances that David cod take on the same surname as his new wife and child, like Paddy did?
This could be s simple way of expanding the Sugden family.
2
Comments
The mass casualties resulting from that cringefest was immense and the darkest hour I had ever witnssed, still have such horrible nightmares from witnessing his horrible singing to this day it's that traumatising!😭
Imagine what he'd be like smugly strutting around with the Sugden name knowing full well his "legendar" status on ED will be 100% sealed for good what by officially being a part of such an important family name? The ego would be just too much!😫
Please let's just nip this all in the bud now and stop giving him anymore ideas above his station.😣
I only count Harry Sugden and Victoria as Sugdens currently in the show now.
He doesn't need another one to keep in the storeroom!!!
Completely agree. Too many babies and secret children pulled out of the woodwork just for a few days of brief storyline drama. Then we're left with them and most of them are pointless! They need to think long-term about whether these children will add value down the line. Amba, Kyle, Moses, Issac.. All completely unneeded additions.
There's Sarah?
She has the name but barely interacts with Victoria or even seems to be aware that Harry exists. But it’s been this way for years, at most there was the minimal interaction from Diane as and when needed but that was it
That’s very true