"Vote her the hell out": Progressives target Kyrsten Sinema after her filibuster defense


This article originally appeared at Common Dreams. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

On what would have been Martin Luther King Jr.'s 93rd birthday, voting rights advocates and progressive lawmakers rallied in Arizona on Saturday to target the first-term Democratic senator blocking legislation aimed at strengthening ballot access amid growing GOP-led suppression efforts.

In attendance at Saturday's demonstrations in Phoenix were members of the King family, which is planning to lead a march to Washington, D.C. on MLK Day with a simple message to lawmakers: "No celebration without legislation."

Referring to Sen. Kyrsten Sinema's (D-Ariz.) Thursday speech defending the 60-vote legislative filibuster, Martin Luther King III argued Saturday that "what she said is, 'I support voting rights, but not as much as I support the ability of someone to take those rights away.'"

"The filibuster is a meaningless Senate rule," he added. "It's a remnant of slavery used to block civil rights for generations."

Sinema's opposition to changing Senate rules means that the House-passed Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act—new legislation that combines Democrats' two major voting rights bills—is likely to fall victim to a Republican filibuster when the majority party attempts to move to a final vote on the measure Tuesday.

If the Senate GOP filibusters, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is expected to try to alter the chamber's 60-vote threshold—an effort that is also doomed to fail unless Sinema and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) drop their support for the rule.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

The Arizona Democrat's refusal to consider even a voting rights exception for the filibuster has infuriated Arizona residents who've watched the state's Republican-controlled legislature ram through voter suppression measures along party lines, making a mockery of Sinema's purported desire for bipartisan cooperation.

"I want the Senate to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, and the only way that will happen is if we carve out the filibuster," Tessa Williams, an Arizonan who attended Saturday's demonstrations in Phoenix, told the local Arizona Republic. "It's critical to protect the right to vote. It's under threat right now, and I think it's much more important that Senator Sinema gets behind this legislation than hold on to the filibuster."

Williams said she feels "betrayed" by Sinema's decision to prioritize the Senate filibuster over voting rights, a sentiment that other Arizonans have expressed in recent months as the Democrat has repeatedly obstructed her own party's agenda.

Sinema's speech Thursday—delivered just before President Joe Biden addressed the Senate Democratic caucus in a closed-door meeting—intensified calls for her ouster in 2024, the end of her first six-year term. A recent Data for Progress survey showed that 70% of likely Arizona Democratic primary voters disapprove of Sinema's job performance.

"She is really disappointing a lot of Arizonans," Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), who is believed to be gearing up for a primary challenge against Sinema, said in an interview Friday. "The fact that she's using a very archaic rule that's not even found in the Constitution to stop voting rights is very problematic for a lot of Arizonans."

During a rally in Phoenix on Saturday, Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.)—who implored Arizonans to "vote her the hell out of office" if Sinema doesn't budge on the filibuster—introduced Gallego as "the next senator from the great state of Arizona."

In the wake of Sinema's floor remarks Thursday, more than 70 women involved with Arizona's Democratic Party signed an open letter urging the reproductive rights political action committee EMILY's List—a leading contributor to Sinema—to "immediately make a public demand to Senator Sinema to support ending the filibuster now."

The Daily Poster reported last week that anti-abortion groups have been pushing Sinema to uphold the legislative filibuster, which is standing in the way of House-passed legislation that would codify Roe v. Wade into federal law.

Sinema is a co-sponsor of the Women's Health Protection Act, just as she's a co-sponsor of the Freedom to Vote Act and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

About an hour from where voting rights advocates marched in Phoenix on Saturday, former President Donald Trump held a rally in Florence, Arizona that underscored the threat he and the Republican Party pose to democracy.

As the New York Times reported, "Mr. Trump's favored candidate for governor, Kari Lake, is a first-time office seeker who has threatened to jail the state's top elections official. His chosen candidate to replace that elections official, a Democrat, is a state legislator named Mark Finchem, who was with a group of demonstrators outside the Capitol on January 6 as rioters tried to stop the certification of the 2020 election."

The Times added that when Trump "took the stage in the evening, he lavished praise on the slate of election-denier candidates in attendance."

Comments / 152

Phillip Rivenbark

The Constitution gives the states the right to make voting laws for their state. That has served us well and keeps the power distributed among the people, not power centralized in DC. We should keep the power in each State. If you believe your states voting laws need to be changed contact your State legislators.

Katrina Talbot

how is it that people think requiring a photo ID for voting is wrong? you literally have to have a photo ID for everything from writing a check at most places to getting financial aid or assistance! I person would think that as a country that we would want only the people who are legally allowed to vote to vote and make a difference with there vote. It amazes me how our for fathers who created the original rules was able to predict what is happening now and put those rules in place to try and curtain these things from happening.PEOPLE YOU LITERALLY HAVE TO HAVE A PHOTO ID FOR EVERYTHING (SNAP BENIFITS, WELDARE, FINANCIAL AID, PURCHASING ALCOHOL AND CIGARETTES, WRITING A CHECK, BOARDING A PLANE, & ETC! People are having a fit about the ID to vote but are fine with having a vaccine passport? 🤦‍♀️

Roger Dill

They are the ones that are taking away your right to have your vote counted as 100%. They want to dilute your vote by stuffing the ballot boxes to steal elections. Why else do they want a person to be able vote without signature verification and ID???


Comments / 0