Abstract
The aim of this study was to observe changes in different components (solid, cystic airspace, or entire tumor) in lung cancer associated with cystic airspace following treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), using computerized tomography (CT). We analyzed serial (baseline, first-time follow-up, and last-time follow-up) clinical data and CT imaging in six patients treated with NC. The diameters, areas, and volumes of different tumor components (solid, cystic airspace, and entire tumor) were measured. Delta (Δ) was used to represent changes in these parameters between two examinations: Δ1(%) represents the change from baseline to first follow-up after NC, and Δ2(%) represents the change from baseline to last follow-up after NC. We used the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) to test for consistency between parameters as measured by two radiologists. The diameter of solid components in all lesions showed a trend of continuous reduction compared with baseline (Δ1 ranged from − 8.3 to − 46.0%, Δ2 from − 30.8 to − 69.2%). For cystic airspace and entire tumors, different lesions showed different trends over the course of treatment. For diameter, area, and volume, Δ1 of changes in the solid component ranged from − 8.3 to − 46.9%, − 19.4 to − 70.8%, and − 19.1 to − 94.7%, respectively; Δ2 ranged from − 30.8 to − 69.2%, − 50.8 to − 92.1%, and − 32.7 to − 99.8% in diameter, area, and volume, respectively. Results were inconsistent between different components of lung cancer associated with cystic airspace that was treated with NC, but the diameter, area, and volume of solid components were continuously reduced during treatment. Furthermore, area and volume measurements showed more-significant variation than diameter measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Lung cancer associated with cystic airspace is a unique type of lung cancer1,2. Tumors with mixed cystic-airspace and solid components account for about 3.7% of all lung cancers3. Mascalchi et al.4 classified these tumors by their different imaging manifestations into four types (I, II, III, and IV). The most common pathological categories include adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC)5,6.
At present, most research on cystic-airspace lung cancer focuses on morphological features as shown on computed tomography (CT), pathological characteristics, and mechanism of tumor formation7,8,9,10. Some studies have reported on treatment modalities and survival outcomes11,12. However, few discuss the criteria by which to evaluate treatment for cystic-airspace lung cancer. Oncologists do not know whether the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) apply equally to cystic-airspace lesions, or which component of the tumor (solid, cystic airspace, or entire tumor) is most suitable for evaluation. Accordingly, detailed serial changes in the solid component, cystic airspace, and total tumor might suitably indicate treatment response in this subtype of lung cancer. Furthermore, serial results of imaging parameters other than tumor diameter (i.e., tumor area or volume) at different time points (baseline, first examination, and last examination) must also be evaluated. This information will aid clinicians in evaluating treatment response and help them optimize follow-up protocol.
The aim of this study was to observe serial parameter changes in different components of lung cancer associated with cystic airspace after treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC).
Materials and methods
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Xuzhou, China; ID No. XYFY2018-KL097-01). As it was a retrospective study, the Ethics Committee exempted it from informed-consent requirements.
Clinical and follow-up data
Patient inclusion criteria included (1) tumor confirmed as primary lung cancer by pathological examination, (2) NC treatment, (3) no previous history of other malignant tumors or related anti-tumor treatment, and (4) consent to undergo CT imaging. Patient exclusion criteria included (1) incomplete NC treatment and (2) lack of serial CT imaging.
Forty-seven lung cancer patients with cystic airspace were treated at our institution between November 2017 and June 2020. Only 6 (12.8%) out of 47 patients who were treated with NC were analyzed. We retrieved their clinical and CT imaging data from the institution’s electronic medical record system (EMRS) and picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Their cancers were staged using the tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) system in accordance with the guidelines of the Union International Cancer Control (UICC), 8th edition13.
All patients were included for follow-up, which was conducted over the telephone or from the EMRS and PACS by a radiologist (P.P.D.) with 2 years’ experience in chest CT. The last follow-up date in this study was September 1, 2020. The study endpoint was changed in different components of lung cancer (solid, cystic airspace, and entire tumor) after chemotherapy.
CT examination
We used different CT scanners in this retrospective study; detailed scanning parameters are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Scanning area was from the apex to the base of the lung at the end of inspiration. After scanning, we reconstructed the acquired images using a standard soft-tissue kernel algorithm at section thickness of 1.25 or 1.5 mm, both without overlap. All examination data were stored in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format for analysis.
CT imaging segmentation and data acquisition
We analyzed CT images from three examinations during NC treatment: baseline, first follow-up examination, and last follow-up examination. Maximum diameters, maximum cross-sectional areas, and volumes of different components (solid tumor, cystic airspace, and entire tumor) of the lesion were measured. The cystic airspace was defined as the gaseous-density shadow, the solid components as soft-density or ground-glass opacity (GGO), including mural nodules, cyst wall, and GGO lesions.
We imported the CT imaging data into ITK-SNAP software (version 3.8; https://www.fsf.org/) in DICOM format for image segmentation. Two radiologists (Y.K.M. and K.X.) with more than 20 years’ combined lung cancer research experience selected the region of interest (ROI) and sketched it layer by layer along the edges of the lesions. The radiologists did not know the details of clinical treatment and survival data. The average measurements they recorded were used in this study’s analysis.
Each facet of the lesion area was labeled green, while the cystic airspace was labeled yellow (Fig. 1). We computed the volumes of lesions with different components. The volume of the solid component was equal to that of the entire lesion minus the volume of the cystic airspace. To measure lesion area, the maximum cross-section of the lesion was selected and segmented along the tumor edge. After segmentation, the single-layer ROI volume was automatically output, and we obtained results after calculation according to the formula (ROIarea = ROIvolume/layer thickness)14 (Fig. 1). The solid-component area was equal to the whole-lesion area minus the cystic-airspace area. We measured lesion diameter directly using the maximum cross-section of the lesion in accordance with the revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)15.
Delta (Δ) represents changes in different parameters from examination to examination:
in which “Baseline” was defined as the last CT before NC, “First Time” as the initial CT examination during NC, and “Last Time” as the last CT examination after NC.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive results were expressed as percentages (%). We used the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) to test the consistency of the quantitative parameters measured by the two radiologists16. An ICC value of 0–0.2 indicated poor consistency, 0.21–0.40 indicated average consistency, 0.41–0.60 indicated moderate consistency, 0.61–0.80 indicated relatively good consistency, and 0.81–1.00 indicated good consistency.
Results
Baseline clinical, laboratory, and CT findings
All six patients (all male, ages 36–73 years) had cough, and four (66.7%) had asthma. Four (66.7%) had a history of smoking. Two (33.3%) had hypertension and diabetes. Three (50%) showed elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels.
Three (50%) patients were classified as type I, one (16.7%) as type II, and two (33.3%) as type III4. We detected a total of six lesions, five (83.3%) of which were in the right lung. Lesion size ranged from 17.9 to 49.5 mm. Three (50%) patients had ACs, and three (50%) had SSCs. One (16.7%) patient had brain metastasis (M1 stage). Only one (16.7%) patient died during the study. Range of follow-up was 7.0–33.0 months (Table 1).
ICC of measurement parameters between the two radiologists
Supplementary Table 2 shows the ICCs of measurement parameters in lung cancer associated with cystic airspace as measured by the two radiologists. The results showed good consistency between the two physicians: ICC values of diameter, area, and volume were 0.991 (0.936–0.999), 0.980 (0.865–0.997), and 0.992 (0.946–0.999), respectively.
Parameter changes in different components on serial CT
Diameters of different components
The diameter of solid components in all lesions showed a trend of continuous reduction compared with baseline parameters. Δ1 ranged from − 8.3 to − 46.0% and Δ2 from − 30.8 to − 69.2% (Table 2, Fig. 2).
In terms of cystic airspace, treatment had inconsistent effects on different lesions. At the first CT examination during treatment, the cystic airspace of only three lesions had decreased (Δ1 ranged from − 4.6 to − 25.0%), whereas that of the other three lesions had increased (Δ1 ranged from 0.5 to 81.9%). At the last CT examination after treatment, the cystic airspaces of only two lesions were reduced (Δ2, − 7.5% and − 29.5%).
The maximum whole-lesion diameters of four lesions were reduced at the first CT examination during treatment and at the last one afterward (Δ1 ranged from − 12.6 to − 38.1% and Δ2 from − 28.4 to − 59.6%; Supplementary Table 3, Fig. 3).
Areas of different components
Compared with baseline, solid components in all six cases were reduced (Δ1 and Δ2 were − 1.94% to − 70.8% and − 50.8% to − 92.1%, respectively; Table 2). Interestingly, the cystic-airspace area of only two lesions decreased (Δ1, − 2.4% to − 38.8%; Δ2, − 35.1% to − 71.1%) while that of four increased during treatment. For Δ1, the whole-tumor area of all six lesions decreased (from − 5.3 to − 62.1%); for Δ2, the whole-tumor area of five lesions was reduced (from − 4.5 to − 81.7%; Supplementary Table 4, Fig. 4).
Volumes of different components
Similarly, solid-component volume decreased significantly in all six lesions during follow-up (Table 2). In terms of cystic-airspace volume, three lesions decreased and three increased at the first CT examination (Δ1 ranged from − 6.5 to − 76.9% and from + 70.0 to + 591.8%, respectively). However, at the last CT examination after treatment, only one lesion decreased in cystic volume (Δ2 = − 90.7%). In terms of whole-lesion volume, four lesions decreased (Δ1 ranged from − 13.7 to − 73.4%, Δ2 from − 17.1 to − 95.2%; Supplementary Table 5, Fig. 5).
Comparisons of different measurement parameters (diameter, area, volume) with serial CT
The magnitude of variation was larger in volume and area than in diameter (Table 2). For diameter, area, and volume, Δ1 of measured changes in the solid component ranged from − 8.3 to − 46.9, − 19.4 to − 70.8, and − 19.1 to − 94.7, respectively; while Δ2 ranged from − 30.8 to − 69.2, − 50.8 to − 92.1, and − 32.7 to − 99.8, respectively. Changes in cystic-airspace and whole-tumor parameters showed similar results.
Discussion
In this study, we measured different components of lung cancer associated with cystic airspace. Interestingly, the trends in our results were not consistent among solid components, cystic-airspace components, and entire tumors on serial CT scan. Furthermore, area and volume showed significant changes, while diameter did not. We observed additional contrary tendencies in most lesions for solid and cystic-airspace components.
Lung cancer associated with cystic airspace is a rare manifestation of the disease. At present, CT is one of the main modalities for cancer staging and for evaluating treatment response and outcomes17,18. Most studies have evaluated treatment response by size of solid tumors19,20. Furthermore, the RECIST guideline (version 1.1) is recommended for such evaluation15. However, the relevant evaluation criteria for cystic lung cancer are rarely discussed, which can confuse oncologists’ attempts to assess the criteria for tumor treatment response and therefore influence treatment strategies for individual patients in clinical practice. Our results demonstrated that different measurements of tumor components showed different results and that only the solid component was reduced by NC treatment. We speculate that the change in the solid component might be more correlated with clinical treatment response. In cystic-airspace lung cancer patients treated with NC, this component was more suitable for evaluation than were the cystic-airspace component and total tumor. However, we observed only six patients, and our study did not discuss the correlations of different component results with tumor long-term outcomes. Therefore, these correlations must be further evaluated by survival outcomes in a larger cohort over a longer follow-up time. The results of such studies could help guide the treatment for lung cancer associated with cystic airspace.
Furthermore, when comparing the degrees of variation in the three measurement parameters (tumor diameter, area, and volume), we found that area and volume changes in treatment were more significant than diameter changes. Some studies show that analysis of the largest cross-sectional area and of volume might more accurately depict the burden of complex objects compared with traditional linear size measurement, which has great clinical implications21,22,23. This could be because small changes in linear size are amplified by corresponding changes in area and volume. Therefore, area and volume might more comprehensively reflect tumor burden by objective three-dimensional measurement, and so measuring these two parameters in lung cancer associated with cystic airspace could be a useful supplement to RECIST criteria. However, the measurement error of area and volume is large, and the working procedure is complicated, which might limit its clinical application.
Some studies that have investigated the formation of cystic airspace have shown that tumor cell proliferation can lead to the formation of valves in the bronchial lumen2,24,25. The small bronchial stenosis prevents partial air exchange, resulting in increased residual-air volume in alveolar space. In our study, some solid components decreased, while some cystic lesions increased, over the course of NC treatment. Solid and cystic-airspace component parameters had contrary tendencies in some lesions. We thought that perhaps the reduction in the solid components resulted in enlargement of the “unidirectional valves.” The parameters of the cystic-airspace component including the total tumor in the lesion were increased. Therefore, we speculate that changes in the cystic-airspace component did not accurately and objectively reflect treatment response.
This study had some limitations. First, the number of cases was small; we analyzed the serial CT images of only six patients. Second, patients’ NC regimens were inconsistent, which might have affected treatment efficacy. Furthermore, two patients were T1N1M0, and one was T2N1M0. We speculate that perhaps the oncologist used an aggressive treatment strategy in clinical practice. Third, such patients’ actual conditions and attitudes toward treatment might influence the oncologist’s treatment decisions. Finally, the pathological lung cancer types of the enrolled patients were not consistent, so we did not perform different subgroup analyses for different pathological types.
In conclusion, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lung cancer with cystic airspace, measurements of different components showed inconsistent results, with only the solid component reduced during treatment. Area and volume measurements changed significantly compared with diameter measurements over the course of treatment.
References
Ryu, J. H. & Swensen, S. J. Cystic and cavitary lung diseases Focal and diffuse. Mayo Clin. Proc 78(6), 744–752 (2003).
Fintelmann, F. J. et al. Lung cancers associated with cystic airspaces: Natural history, pathologic correlation, and mutational analysis. J. Thorac. Imaging 32(3), 176–188 (2017).
Farooqi, A. et al. Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 199(4), 781–786 (2012).
Mascalchi, M. et al. Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 39(1), 102–108 (2015).
American College of Radiology. Lung imaging reporting and data system (lung-RADS) version 1.0. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/Lung-RADS. Accessed 21 Dec 2016 (2014).
MacMahon, H. et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: A statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237, 395–400 (2005).
Guo, J. et al. Lung cancer presenting as thin-walled cysts: An analysis of 15 cases and review of literature. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 12(1), e105–e112 (2016).
Sheard, S. et al. Lung cancers associated with cystic airspaces: Underrecognized features of early disease. Radio Graph. 38(3), 704–717 (2018).
Womack, N. A. & Graham, E. A. Epithelial metaplasia in congenital cystic disease of the lung: Its possible relation to carcinoma of the bronchus. Am. J. Pathol. 17(5), 645–654 (1941).
Xue, X. et al. Comparative study of solitary thin-walled cavity lung cancer with computed tomography and pathological findings. Lung Cancer 78(1), 45–50 (2012).
Watanabe, Y. et al. Surgically resected solitary cavitary lung adenocarcinoma: Association between clinical, pathologic, and radiologic findings and prognosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 99, 968–974 (2015).
Wang, X. et al. Solitary thin-walled cystic lung cancer with extensive extrapulmonary metastasis: A case report and review of the literature. Medicine 97(43), e12950 (2018).
The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project. Proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 11(1), 39–51 (2016).
Ball, L. et al. Ultra-low-dose sequential computed tomography for quantitative lung aeration assessment—A translational study. Intensive Care Med. Exp. 5(1), 19 (2017).
Eisenhauer, E. A. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer 45(2), 228–247 (2009).
Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 86(2), 420–428 (1979).
Nanavaty, P., Alvarez, M. S. & Alberts, W. M. Lung cancer screening: Advantages, controversies, and applications. Cancer Control. 21(1), 9–14 (2014).
Tu, S. J., Wang, C. W., Pan, K. T., Wu, Y. C. & Wu, C. T. Localized thin-section CT with radiomics feature extraction and machine learning to classify early-detected pulmonary nodules from lung cancer screening. Phys. Med. Biol. 63(6), 065005 (2018).
Beer, L. et al. Comparison of RECIST, iRECIST, and PERCIST for the evaluation of response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 44(7), 535–543 (2019).
Kuhl, C. K. et al. Validity of RECIST version 1.1 for response assessment in metastatic cancer: A prospective multireader study. Radiology https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180648 (2018).
Planz, V. B., Lubner, M. G. & Pickhardt, P. J. Volumetric analysis at abdominal CT: Oncologic and non-oncologic applications. Br. J. Radiol. 92(1095), 20180631 (2019).
Bretschi, M. et al. Assessing treatment response of osteolytic lesions by manual volumetry, automatic segmentation, and RECIST in experimental bone metastases. Acad. Radiol. 21(9), 1177–1184 (2014).
Han, L. et al. CT quantitative parameters to predict the invasiveness of lung pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs). Clin. Radiol. 73(5), 504.e1-504.e7 (2018).
Masuzawa, K. et al. Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung presenting as a large, thin walled cyst: A case report and literature review. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 6(3), 433–437 (2017).
Xue, X. et al. Comparative study of solitary thin walled cavity lung cancer with computed tomography and pathological findings. Lung Cancer 78(1), 45–50 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We thank LetPub (http://www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.D. and Y.M. wrote the main manuscript text. H.Z., S.Z. and prepared figures and tables. Z.L. and L.Z. collected and assembled of data. K.X. designed the main idea of the article. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dou, P., Meng, Y., Zhao, H. et al. Serial CT changes in different components of lung cancer associated with cystic airspace in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sci Rep 11, 23544 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02897-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02897-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.