Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Cost efficiency and effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim in autologous transplant

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Renwick MJ, Smolina K, Gladstone EJ, Weymann D, Morgan SG. Postmarket policy considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daller J. Biosimilars: A consideration of the regulations in the United States and European union. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 2016;76:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, Ozer H, Armitage JO, Balducci L, et al. 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3187–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cottler-Fox MH, Lapidot T, Petit I, Kollet O, DiPersio JF, Link D, et al. Stem cell mobilization. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2003:419–37.

  5. Waller CF, Semiglazov VF, Tjulandin S, Bentsion D, Chan S, Challand R. A phase III randomized equivalence study of biosimilar filgrastim versus Amgen filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer. Onkologie 2010;33:504–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw BE, Confer DL, Hwang WY, Pamphilon DH, Pulsipher MA. Concerns about the use of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the mobilization of stem cells in normal donors: position of the World Marrow Donor Association. Haematologica 2011;96:942–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elayan MM, Horowitz JG, Magraner JM, Shaughnessy PJ, Bachier C. Tbo-Filgrastim versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil Engraftment for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21:1921–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bassi S, Stroppa EM, Moroni CF, Arbasi MC, Trabacchi E, Di Franco A, et al. Safety and efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biosimilars in engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: a 4-year, single institute experience with different conditioning regimens. Blood Transfus. 2015;13:478–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchesi F, Cerchiara E, Dessanti ML, Gumenyuk S, Franceschini L, Palombi F, et al. Comparison between biosimilar filgrastim vs other granulocyte-colony stimulating factor formulations (originator filgrastim, peg-filgrastim and lenograstim) after autologous stem cell transplantation: a retrospective survey from the Rome Transplant Network. Br J Haematol. 2015;169:293–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ianotto JC, Tempescul A, Yan X, Delepine P, Le Calloch R, Hardy E, et al. Experience (1 year) of G-CSF biosimilars in PBSCT for lymphoma and myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2012;47:874–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gascon P. Presently available biosimilars in hematology-oncology: G-CSF. Target Oncol 2012;7:S29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Italian Medicines Agency. The Medicines Utilisation Monitoring Centre (OsMed). National report on medicines use in Italy. Year 2015. Rome: OsMed; 2016, p. 566.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fondi di Ricerca Locale, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy and by Fondazione Neoplasie del sangue (FO.NE. SA),Torino, Italy. The authors would like to thank Maria Josè Fornaro, Antonella Fiorillo and Franca Trotto Gatta for excellent secretarial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.G., M.B., and B.B. designed the study. L.G. and B.B. wrote the report. B.B. supervised the clinical conduction of the study and data analysis. L.B. collected data. B.B., L.G., L.B., M.M., D.F., F.C., G.L., and S.B. recruited the patients and supervised data collection. M.S. and F.C. provided cost analysis. T.F., P.O., V.R., and V.T. provided stem cell collection, mobilization data. M.B., M.M., J.S.L., S.L., B.B., and L.G., and reviewed and assisted in writing the manuscript. A.E. did the statistical analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luisa Giaccone.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giaccone, L., Brunello, L., Londono, J.S. et al. Cost efficiency and effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim in autologous transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 57, 312–314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01541-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01541-1

Search

Quick links