Downing Street has insisted no decision has yet been taken on a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Winter Olympics. Earlier Jacob Rees-Mogg, the leader of the Commons, prompted speculation that the government might stay away when he told MPs that “no tickets have been booked” for ministers for the event. But No 10 said:
We have said that the prime minister’s long-standing view is that boycotts don’t work. Our position is the same: no decision has been made on government representation at the games.
Tory MP suggests having women play roles like Dr Who helps push young men into crime
MPs held a debate on international men’s day (last Friday) in Westminster Hall today. The Conservative MP Nick Fletcher, who won Don Valley from Labour in 2019, opened the debate, and he argued that many problems facing men and boys were not receiving enough attention. He focused in particular on the importance of positive role models, and he said masculinity was something that should be celebrated. At this point in his speech speech he suggested that the trend towards having characters like Dr Who played by women was pushing young men into crime. He said:
I would also like to reiterate something that seems to be very topical at the moment, although much more for women than men, and that is the need for men to have their own identity and for masculinity to be something that can be celebrated at times, rather than continually vilified.
Everywhere, not least within the cultural sphere, there seems to be a call from a tiny, and very vocal, minority that every male character, or good role model, must have a female replacement. One only needs to look at the discussion surrounding who will play the next James Bond. And it’s not just James Bond. In recent years we have seen Dr Who, Ghostbusters, Luke Skywalker, the Equalizer all replaced by women. And men are left with the Krays and Tommy Shelby. Is there any wonder that we are seeing so many young men committing crime? These programmes make crime look cool. Trust me, a lifetime in prison is not cool, and neither is living with the memory of a stabbed son or daughter.
Boris Johnson's former Spectator colleague launches website to catalogue all his lies
The journalist Peter Oborne has launched a new project to catalogue the lies told by Boris Johnson. The website is here.
Oborne launched a version of the website soon after Johnson became prime minister, but he abandoned work on it after the 2019 general election. After using crowdfunding to raise money, Oborne was able to hire staff and the new version is more impressive. It is still unfinished – it only covers untrue or misleading statements made by Johnson and his ministers up to February 2020 – but the entries are well researched, with extensive links explaining why comments have been labelled as false.
Oborne says the project will be “like painting the Forth Bridge”. He explains: “The task can never be completed because he and his ministers are constantly producing more examples.”
In a mission statement, Oborne explains why he feels so strongly about politicians who lie (he has written two books on the subject, focusing on Tony Blair and Johnson). He also explains why he uses a particularly wide definition of lying, covering statements which are “reckless as to the truth”.
If you did not know otherwise, you might assume from the website that Oborne is vehemently leftwing. But what makes him particularly interesting – and authoritative – as a critic of Johnson is that, like Johnson, he has spent most of his career as a columnist on rightwing newspapers. He worked for the Daily Telegraph and the Daily Mail, and for several years he was political editor of the Spectator, while Johnson was editor.
Often it is people who have worked with Johnson closely who turn out to be his strongest critics. Sonia Purnell, who was Johnson’s deputy in the Daily Telegraph’s Brussels office, went on to write a damning biography of him. Oborne has written his own book about Johnson in which he said: “I have never encountered a senior British politician who lies and fabricates so regularly, so shamelessly and so systematically as Boris Johnson.” Alan Duncan was Johnson’s deputy when Johnson was foreign secretary, and later published diaries describing Johnson as an “embarrassing buffoon”. And when Johnson became PM, at the start his closest adviser was Dominic Cummings. Cummings is now one of his most dangerous enemies. Like Oborne, Cummings believes that Johnson is a liar, although Cummings has also said that this label is sometimes hard to justify because Johnson does not particularly care what the truth is anyway. (Under a strict definition, to lie you have to say something that you know to be untrue.) This is how Cummings put it in a blog earlier this year.
[Johnson] rewrites reality in his mind afresh according to the moment’s demands. He lies – so blatantly, so naturally, so regularly – that there is no real distinction possible with him, as there is with normal people, between truth and lies. He always tells people what they want to hear and he never means it.
Wallace says restructured army will offer more exciting career for recruits than he had as soldier in 1990s
During his Commons statement Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, was asked by the Lib Dem MP Jamie Stone if the army restructuring announced today would discourage people from seeking a career in the military. Quite the opposite, argued Wallace, who served as an officer in the Scots Guards in the 1990s. In an response that revealed quite a lot about the motivations of people joining the army, Wallace said:
I would have stayed in the army if it had looked like this. But I was in an army that I think was hollowed out. Equipment didn’t quite work. The greatest adventure you had was probably every two years going to Northern Ireland, but that was about as far as it went. Hong Kong had closed. And there was a lack of sense of purpose, in my view, and a lack of clearly identified adversary that we were setting ourselves against. That was really important.
So I think this army is going to be more exciting, more rewarding, and more enabling for young people to grow their skills. It is going to be more fluid with the integration of the reserves, and allow reserves and regulars to be much more able to move between each other, depending on their personal circumstances ....
The determination to be out and about around the world - the one thing soldiers don’t want to be is stuck in a barracks, in the UK, sometimes doing not very much. They want to be out. I was in Oman only the other week seeing them exercising with the Omanis. They couldn’t stop talking about how exciting and fun it was. I was in Poland last week, watching the United Kingdom forces live-firing alongside Polish, United States, Croatian forces, doing a live-firing exercise in Poland. That’s what I want our army to do.
Labour says army reorganisation confirms Johnson breaking pre-election promise not to cut size of armed forces
This is what John Healey, the shadow defence secretary, told MPs earlier when he said the army restructuring announced today (see 1.21pm) showed Boris Johnson had broken his election promise not to cut the size of the armed forces. Healey said:
[Ben Wallace, the defence secretary] cannot say he’s reduced the role of the army. He cannot say the army already has the high-tech kit it needs to replace boots on the ground. He cannot say the threats to the UK have diminished in a day to day – indeed, today he says they’re proliferating.
Yet he’s still cutting the army established strength by 9,000 over the next three years, and that’s on top of 16,000 soldiers cut since 2010.
The prime minister promised in his election manifesto launch in 2019, on behalf of all Conservative members: “We will not be cutting our armed forces in any form ... We will be maintaining the size of our armed forces.”
The prime minister may take the pledges he makes to our armed forces and the public lightly, but we do not. By the time of the next election Britain will have the smallest army in 300 years. Size matters. The defence secretary’s deeper cuts now could limit our forces’ ability simultaneously to deploy overseas and support allies, maintain strong national defences and support our domestic resilience, just as they have been helping the country through the Covid crisis.
The Conservative manifesto did not include a promise to maintain the size of the armed forces, but Johnson did make this promise at an event during the election campaign.
Healey also said the plan would leave the army too small. He said:
I fear that this plan leaves the British army too small, too thinly stretched, too poorly equipped to deal with the threats that the UK and our allies now face, which are growing and diversifying.
And this is what Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, said about it in his opening statement to MPs.
The army will now be reorganised to operate on a continuous basis, fielding all the relevant capabilities for this era of constant competition and persistently engaged around the globe supporting our partners and deterring our adversaries.
Crucially it will also be an army designed for genuine warfighting credibility as an expeditionary fighting force that will be both deployable and lethal when called upon to fight and win.
In the Commons Priti Patel, the home secretary, has just started making a statement about the deaths of 27 people who drowned trying to cross the Channel in a small boat yesterday. My colleague Damien Gayle is covering what she says in our live blog on the tragedy.
HMRC to relocate to Newcastle office owned by Tory donors via tax haven
HM Revenue and Customs has struck a deal to relocate tax officials into a new office complex in Newcastle owned by major Conservative party donors through an offshore company based in a tax haven, my colleague Harry Davies and Rowena Mason report.
According to Sky’s Sam Coates, members of the executive committee of the Conservative 1922 Committee gave the impression they liked what they heard after they left their meeting with Boris Johnson at No 10. (See 12.40pm.)
Sports minister indicates independent regulator for football could be set up quickly after Crouch review
Nigel Huddleston, the sports minister, told MPs earlier that the government would “work at pace” on setting up an independent regulator for football. He was responding to an urgent question about the fan-led review of football governance led by the former sports minister, Tracey Crouch.
Huddleston said:
The report shows that fundamental change is needed in our national game and fans deserve that. We are at a turning point for football in this country.
The review is a detailed and worthy piece of work that will require a substantive response and plan of action from across government, but the primary recommendation of the review, that football requires a strong independent regulator, is a recommendation that I and the government endorse in principle today.
The government will now work at pace to determine the most effective way to deliver the independent regulator and any powers that might be needed.
But Huddleston also said the government could not “commit 100%” to implementing all the report’s recommendations.
The report is here (pdf), and here is my colleague Paul MacInnes’s overnight preview story about it.
According to Bloomberg’s Kitty Donaldson,Boris Johnson has had a meeting this morning with the executive of the Conservative backbench 1922 Committee, the shop stewards of the Conservative parliamentary party. It must have been a fascinating meeting, although the 1922 executive are a relatively discreet bunch and so we may learn little about what was actually said.
Labour claims restructuring will leave army 'too small'
Responding for Labour, John Healey, the shadow defence secretary, says today’s announcement contradicts a promise made by Boris Johnson during the 2019 election campaign not to cut the size of the armed forces.
Johnson may take his promises lightly, but Labour does not, says Healey.
He says, despite Ben Wallace’s claims, this restructuring is driven by the need to save money.
He says this plan will leave the British army “too small, too thinly-stretched and too poorly-equipped” to deal with the threats the UK faces.
Comments (…)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion