CreatorsPublishersAdvertisers
View more in
Congress & Courts

The FEC unanimously rejected Matt Gaetz's complaint accusing Twitter of interfering in the 2020 election by using fact-check labels on Trump's tweets

Business Insider
Business Insider
 30 days ago
https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=073z10_0c6133V400
Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida at a markup hearing of the National Defense Authorization Act on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2021.
  • The FEC unanimously rejected Rep. Matt Gaetz's complaint alleging "domestic election interference" by Twitter.
  • Gaetz had argued that Twitter was making an illegal contribution to Trump's opponents by fact-checking.
  • The commission ultimately agreed that Twitter had legitimate commercial reasons to fact-check tweets.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page .

The Federal Election Commission unanimously rejected a complaint by Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, which alleged that Twitter was interfering in the 2020 presidential election by affixing "fact-check" labels to some of former President Trump's tweets.

In May of 2020, after Twitter first applied fact-check labels to factually inaccurate tweets about mail-in voting by the president, Gaetz announced on Tucker Carlson's Fox News show that he was filing a complaint with the commission.

"Twitter is interfering with an election. If we just wait around, big tech will steal this election from Donald Trump and the American people," Gaetz said in a press release at the time.

This is Gaetz's second Twitter complaint to get rejected by the commission-- last week, Insider reported that the commission rejected a Gaetz complaint over an alleged 2018 "shadow ban" by the platform.

In his initial complaint in May 2020, Gaetz alleged that Twitter had become a "shadow contributor to the Democratic National Committee" and making a prohibited contribution to Trump's political opponents.

"By opining on the content of the President's tweets, Twitter is injecting its own editorial opinions in an attempt to lower the credibility of the President," alleged Gaetz in the complaint. "By failing to adhere to the true nature of a [Section 230] protected platform, Twitter then degrades itself and becomes the 'wet-market of ideas.'"

Election fraud is criminal and its penalties should be determined by the courts, not by @jack," continued the complaint, referring to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey by his handle. "Twitter users may erroneously perceive a candidate with a fact-check linked to his tweets as a scarlet letter, which is wholly unjust and in violation of FEC law."

As in a previous complaint , Gaetz also argued that Twitter is a debate platform subject to FEC regulation, a notion that the commission refuted in both cases.

Twitter responded to Gaetz's complaint less than two months later, pointing to its "Civic Integrity Policy" while indicating that the company had implemented new policies to combat misinformation in part due to advertisers' concerns.

"Advertisers have asked companies to do more in this area or risk losing advertising revenue," a representative for Twitter wrote. "Just last month, Unilever cited misinformation and related concerns in support of its decision to halt advertising on Twitter and other platforms."

The company also pointed to its fact-check labeling of a tweet by actress Debra Messing - who tweeted a photoshopped image of Adolf Hitler holding a Bible alongside a similar photo of Trump after protesters were removed by force from Lafayette Square in front of the White House - as an example of the platform's nonpartisan approach.

A December legal analysis by the commission found that Twitter's conduct failed to meet the criteria of being an illegal contribution or expenditure, in part because the fact checks themselves did not include references to Trump's candidacy.

"[Gaetz's] argument is not borne out by the content of Twitter's post, however, which does not reference his status as a candidate, the upcoming election, or exhort readers to vote in a certain way," reads the analysis. "Instead, it describes Trump's tweets as "unsubstantiated" and references various news sources that cast doubt on his claims."

The FEC unanimously found in August 2021 that Twitter did not violate election laws and then overwhelmingly voted to close the file.

Read the original article on
Business Insider

Comments / 68

Liam Borg
30d ago

You know, there's a LOT of reasons that I'm not proud to be a Floridian citizen. Matt Gaetz easily comes in top 5. That might just be taller than anything else he came in.

Reply(7)
54
Jon Quad
29d ago

Why isn't this douchebag in jail yet?!?!?! These politicians seem to never got arrested or convicted and its just seems to go away. If one of us did we would be convicted and in prison already. These prima donnas are laugh at us!!!!

Reply
27
David Nail
28d ago

when it comes to Matt gaetz the only thing I'm concerned about is when they're going to arrest him for having sex with an underage girl and human trafficking this is a perfect example of how the Republicans don't think the rule of law applies to them but I need to change that they know the rule of law doesn't apply to them had that been any other guy accused of having sex with a person maybe in jail

Reply(3)
23

Comments / 0