CreatorsPublishersAdvertisers
View more in
Congress & Courts

McCarthy opposes infrastructure bill despite Senate GOP support: ‘Different situation now’

WashingtonExaminer
WashingtonExaminer
 23 days ago

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3sAUnu_0c5qLS4o00


H ouse Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy justified pushing his caucus to oppose a $1.2 trillion infrastructure proposal that passed the Senate.

“People have differences of opinion, but the one thing, I think, everybody now sees is what the bill passed in the Senate is a different situation now that it came to the House,” McCarthy said in a press conference on Thursday. “It’s one bill. So you're not voting for a $1.5 trillion infrastructure bill, you're voting for a $5 trillion bill.”

House Republican leaders announced on Tuesday that they will whip votes against the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill, which was crafted by a bipartisan group of senators and passed with support from 19 Senate Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, last month.

Democratic leaders, though, have put the bill on a two-track path alongside a sweeping social programs spending bill of up to $3.5 trillion that can pass without Republican support in the Senate.

HOUSE GOP TO WHIP VOTES AGAINST ‘BIPARTISAN’ INFRASTRUCTURE BILL IN WIN FOR CONSERVATIVE WING

The conservative Freedom Caucus and Republican Study Committee for weeks had been messaging against the infrastructure bill, calling it a “trojan horse” for the reconciliation bill.

Now, left-wing Democrats are sparring with centrist Democrats over the content and timing of the infrastructure and reconciliation bills. Dozens of members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are expected to vote against the infrastructure bill if the reconciliation bill is not ready.

“They have their internal firing squad right now upset with each other because one side won't vote for it unless they get reconciliation,” McCarthy said. “So whatever agreement they come upon is not about the infrastructure, it's about whether they can spend $5 trillion. That's different than what they saw in the Senate.”

Despite House Republican leadership whipping votes against the infrastructure bill, a handful of Republicans say they will still vote in favor of it.

Illinois Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger said on CNN Thursday that “it is a mistake” for Republican leadership to whip votes against the bill.

“I think we need to allow members to vote on a bipartisan bill as they wish. There is concern, of course, with what you’re seeing on the Democratic side, where progressives are saying we have to pass the $3.5 trillion before we can even talk about this $1.5,” Kinzinger said. “Members of the Republicans that want to vote for the bipartisan bill, you shouldn’t whip against it. I intended to vote for it. I think there will be a number of people joining me."

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

McCarthy rebuffed the suggestion that he is asking his conference to vote against popular infrastructure spending programs.

“You don't get millions of dollars for roads and broadband. What you get is $5 trillion of more inflation, you get a bigger socialist big government, you get a harm to our economy,” McCarthy said.

Washington Examiner Videos

Comments / 35

Truth60
22d ago

It's funny, when the rich got a tax break they all was in on it and that raised the budget tremendously, a bill to help American people and infrastructure , they complain about raising the budget. Tax the rich properly and the budget will be find. Really ? It's time fire we the people to start pushing for this infrastructure bill to go through by voting ask them out in 2022. GO VOTE. btw any word on the Arizona ninja audit ? 😆

Reply(10)
7
Candace Rann
23d ago

I agree with McCarthy it’s wrong inflation is high enough now specially with all these migrants coming over we will get taxed even more and we will be in a recession for sure and I’m a Independent not democrat or republican

Reply(9)
3
wayne stewart
21d ago

yeah we dont need roads and bridges rebuilt after all a lot of them are only close to 100 years old

Reply(1)
5

Comments / 0