Is an Agile Work Environment the Future Iteration of Hybrid Jobs?

A mid adult businessman smiles confidently as he talks with a team of associates during a virtual meeting during the COVID-19 pandemic.
SDI Productions / Getty Images

Commitment to Our Readers

GOBankingRates' editorial team is committed to bringing you unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methodologies to evaluate financial products and services - our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our products and services review methodology.

20 Years
Helping You Live Richer

Reviewed
by Experts

Trusted by
Millions of Readers

The hybrid workplace model seems like it’s here to stay, despite the brief “great office return,” which has been placed on pause due to the Delta variant surge. While it has been praised as a great benefactor to work-life balance, now some experts argue that the hybrid model might not be what employees want and that this is not a “one size fits all” situation.

See: End of Unemployment Benefits Won’t Solve Labor Shortage — How Can Employers Adapt?Find: Hourly Workers Say That Companies Need To Provide These Perks To Attract New Hires

Instead, employees would rather have flexibility, or “agility,” and choose on their own terms where and when they want to work. Some employees feel there are adverse consequences to the hybrid model due to the lack of human interaction from working from home. The BBC noted that these include a perception from those who often work from home that it could have a negative impact on their career, linked to a lack of interaction with colleagues and managers.

Ashley Paterson, founder and CEO of Healthy Hippo Naturals, agrees. She told GOBankingRates that while she feels like WFH seems like a more desirable option at times, “in all reality, nothing beats being face to face with management and working in an environment where you can bounce ideas off each other, oversee what everyone is doing and build stronger relationships.”

Other potential negative consequences of the hybrid model include “those who want to climb the ladder could feel compelled to spend more time in the office, so they’re visible to the powers that be,” according to the BBC. “Some people, meanwhile, could experience difficulties switching seamlessly between home and office work environments.”

Gen Z: The Future of Finances: 42% of Gen Z Prioritize Work-Life Balance Over Other Job Perks, Survey Says

Paris Riha, associate wealth advisor at Arch Global Advisors, says that while some see the idea of juggling two workplaces as frustrating, “it’s hard to believe that after a year and a half into the pandemic individuals don’t have a seamless work area set up at home in addition to the office.”

“I can almost guarantee that if individuals truly work hard, that work will be noticed whether you are present in the office or not,” Riha told GOBankingRates. “The one downside is that you are not able to communicate as easily among teams in the office — which can negatively affect how quickly you learn and grow.”

Compare: The Best (and Worst) US Cities for Work-Life Balance

In addition, flexibility, or the ability to choose the location of the workplace, is becoming more of a crucial factor. A survey by Mercer and AECOM found that when asked whether flexibility is of importance once the pandemic has passed, 56% of respondents said they would “consider switching employers if it wasn’t an option.”

Credit Karma, for example, isn’t asking workers to return to its offices in Oakland, California and Charlotte, North Carolina until January. When they do, however, the in-office schedule will be flexible and determined by the employee and manager instead of set company-wide, Colleen McCreary, chief people officer at Credit Karma, told CNBC. She added that over the past several months, she has had to remind leaders at her company that hybrid is not the arrangement they’re offering to workers.

“A few of them have spoken on panels and used that word and I had to tell them not to,” she stated. “If my kid has soccer on Thursdays and I have to be in the office all day on Thursday and can’t get him there, that may be hybrid, but it’s not flexible and isn’t working for me,” McCreary clarified to CNBC. “We’re trying to empower employees and teams to take responsibility for what works for them rather than wait for us to set it.”

Best of Both Worlds: These 8 Careers Fields Are Now Hiring for More Hybrid Positions

Deloitte, a professional services network, announced a similar effort in the U.K., calling it “agile working.” This model highlights how its employees “will be able to choose when, where and how they work in the future, once it is safe to do so.”

“The impact of the pandemic has profoundly changed our way of life, not least in the way we work,” CEO Richard Houston said in the announcement. “The last year has really shown that one size does not fit all when it comes to balancing work and personal lives. It has also shown that we can trust our people to make the right choice in when, how and where they work.”

Discover: Best (and Worst) States for Work-Life BalanceKnow: Warning Signs of a Toxic Hybrid Workplace

Dimitris Tsingos, cofounder and president of eLearning company Epignosis, told GOBankingRates that the future of work will remain flexible. “Over the past 18 months, flexible work has given people a taste of how they can achieve a strong work-life balance, allowing them to more effectively manage their home responsibilities — time with family, the ability to pursue hobbies and the opportunity to focus on their wellness — with their professional obligations,” he said. “To make a workplace culture future-proof, workers must have freedom of choice. Companies that require in-person attendance five days a week will lose talent who want more autonomy, and those that don’t have an office space may turn off employees who benefit from in-person face-time.”

More From GOBankingRates

Last updated: September 22, 2021

BEFORE YOU GO

See Today's Best
Banking Offers