CreatorsPublishersAdvertisers
View more in
Suffolk County, NY

Woman Charged With Prostitution After Raid At Long Island Massage Parlor

Daily Voice
Daily Voice
 2021-07-31
https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3xI4Jh_0bDh7dBV00
94 Montauk Highway in East Moriches. Photo Credit: Google Maps street view

A woman was arrested for prostitution after a raid at a Long Island massage parlor.

In response to community complaints, authorities in Suffolk County conducted an investigation into illegal activities at S & A Spa, located in East Moriches at 94 Montauk Highway at around 4 p.m. Friday, July 30, Suffolk County Police said.

Jadi Bi, age 47, of Rego Park, was charged with:

  • One count of unauthorized practice of a profession, a Class E felony, under the New York State Education Law;
  • One count of prostitution, a Class B misdemeanor, under the New York State Penal Law.

The raid was conducted by:

  • Suffolk County Police Seventh Precinct Crime Section officers,
  • Town of Brookhaven Law Department,
  • Town of Brookhaven Fire Marshal,
  • Town of Brookhaven Building Inspector.

The Town of Brookhaven is continuing with its investigation.

Bi is scheduled to be arraigned on Wednesday, Aug. 18 at First District Court in Central Islip.

to sign up for Daily Voice's free daily emails and news alerts.

Comments / 37

idan sims
07-31

Four law enforcement and regulatory agencies were involved in the arrest  of one Korean woman in a Suffolk massage parlor. That's as hard as finding a Jew in a synagogue. Did they all get there on the same police bus?Do the citizens of Suffolk feel safer? How many murders or assaults occurred that day in Suffolk?

Reply
15
Noyb Stillnoyb
07-31

Leave her alone. She’s just trying to pay the bills. Unless of course she’s been forced into this and if that’s the case she should be protected , not charged

Reply(11)
11
not today satan..
07-31

Nothing said about the white men who received said services? We all know it’s White guys that frequent massage parlors for extra treatment.

Reply(4)
6

Comments / 0