Special Report
COVID-19: Over 1.8 Million Vaccines Have Been Distributed to New Hampshire. This is How Many the State Has Actually Given Out
Published:
It has now been 31 weeks since the first shipments of the COVID-19 vaccine were sent out to states, kicking off the largest vaccination campaign in human history. As of July 21, 390,174,755 doses of the vaccine have been sent out across the country — equivalent to 118.9% of the U.S. population.
While the initial distribution of the vaccine took longer than federal projections had indicated, in recent months the U.S. has made great leaps in the worldwide race to administer vaccinations — and some states are faring far better than others. Under the current system, led by the White House COVID-19 Response Team, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sends states limited shipments of the vaccine as well as funding and tasks them with distributing the vaccine in accordance with relatively loose federal guidelines.
Each state has developed its own rollout plan, prioritizing different age groups and classes of essential workers. The mix of policies and logistical challenges across the country has led to wide variations across states in both the percentage of vaccines that have been administered and the percentage of the population that has been vaccinated.
In New Hampshire, 84.1% of allocated vaccines have been administered to residents as of July 21, lower than the national average of 86.9% and the 18th smallest share of all states.
The administered doses amount to 115.9% of the state population, greater than the 103.3% national figure and the 11th largest share of all states.
While a majority of Americans remain unvaccinated due to a lack of supply, there are some who have no plans to receive a vaccine at all. According to a survey from the U.S. Census Bureau, 44.6% of U.S. adults 18 and over who have not yet received the vaccine will either probably not or definitely not get a COVID-19 vaccine in the future. In New Hampshire, 33.5% of adults who have not yet received the vaccine report that they will probably not or definitely not get a vaccine in the future, the second smallest share of any state. The most common reason cited for not wanting a vaccine is being concerned about possible side effects. Other commonly cited reasons include not trusting the government, that they were planning to wait and see if it is safe, and believing they don’t need a vaccine.
To determine how states are doing with the vaccine rollout, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. States were ranked based on the number of vaccines administered within a state as a percentage of the number of vaccines distributed to that state by the federal government as of July 21. Data on confirmed COVID-19 cases as of July 21 came from various state and local health departments and were adjusted for population using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 American Community Survey. Data on the percentage of adults who probably or definitely will not get a COVID-19 vaccine and their reasons for not getting one came from the Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey, conducted from May 12, 2021 to May 24, 2021.
Rank | State | Vaccines distributed from federal gov’t | Vaccines administered in state | Pct. of vaccines administered | Vaccines administered as % of pop. | COVID-19 cases per 100,000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | Alabama | 4,919,470 | 3,485,659 | 70.9% | 71.1% | 11,440 |
49 | Georgia | 11,405,925 | 8,747,755 | 76.7% | 82.4% | 10,793 |
48 | Mississippi | 2,715,315 | 2,085,335 | 76.8% | 70.1% | 10,981 |
47 | West Virginia | 1,925,615 | 1,482,221 | 77.0% | 82.7% | 9,203 |
46 | Idaho | 1,720,650 | 1,355,401 | 78.8% | 75.8% | 11,016 |
45 | South Carolina | 5,405,005 | 4,322,933 | 80.0% | 84.0% | 11,700 |
44 | North Carolina | 11,897,730 | 9,551,675 | 80.3% | 91.1% | 9,753 |
43 | Arkansas | 2,899,360 | 2,344,406 | 80.9% | 77.7% | 12,015 |
42 | Kansas | 3,146,645 | 2,558,805 | 81.3% | 87.8% | 11,100 |
41 | Alaska | 842,985 | 688,769 | 81.7% | 94.2% | 9,494 |
40 | Delaware | 1,306,605 | 1,072,059 | 82.0% | 110.1% | 11,336 |
39 | Oregon | 5,708,375 | 4,686,883 | 82.1% | 111.1% | 5,026 |
38 | Michigan | 11,786,370 | 9,684,635 | 82.2% | 97.0% | 10,048 |
37 | Maryland | 8,635,250 | 7,096,476 | 82.2% | 117.4% | 7,678 |
36 | Texas | 32,505,445 | 26,744,604 | 82.3% | 92.2% | 10,447 |
35 | Oklahoma | 4,074,580 | 3,377,157 | 82.9% | 85.3% | 11,761 |
34 | Arizona | 8,320,990 | 6,976,583 | 83.8% | 95.8% | 12,478 |
33 | New Hampshire | 1,874,920 | 1,576,441 | 84.1% | 115.9% | 7,348 |
32 | Wyoming | 521,255 | 440,081 | 84.4% | 76.0% | 10,976 |
31 | Missouri | 6,287,465 | 5,314,903 | 84.5% | 86.6% | 10,548 |
30 | Louisiana | 4,152,520 | 3,510,623 | 84.5% | 75.5% | 10,668 |
29 | Rhode Island | 1,537,755 | 1,310,650 | 85.2% | 123.7% | 14,440 |
28 | Montana | 1,124,765 | 960,755 | 85.4% | 89.9% | 10,728 |
27 | South Dakota | 975,045 | 836,792 | 85.8% | 94.6% | 14,101 |
26 | New Jersey | 11,789,495 | 10,178,925 | 86.3% | 114.6% | 11,584 |
25 | Florida | 25,398,165 | 21,955,490 | 86.4% | 102.2% | 11,206 |
24 | Tennessee | 6,490,700 | 5,630,436 | 86.7% | 82.4% | 12,805 |
23 | Ohio | 12,586,795 | 10,939,162 | 86.9% | 93.6% | 9,557 |
22 | Hawaii | 1,960,680 | 1,704,642 | 86.9% | 120.4% | 2,664 |
21 | Maine | 1,883,850 | 1,648,394 | 87.5% | 122.6% | 5,168 |
20 | Indiana | 6,816,730 | 5,971,607 | 87.6% | 88.7% | 11,291 |
19 | Iowa | 3,518,515 | 3,102,564 | 88.2% | 98.3% | 11,909 |
18 | California | 49,923,685 | 44,290,970 | 88.7% | 112.1% | 9,487 |
17 | Utah | 3,299,590 | 2,939,399 | 89.1% | 91.7% | 13,182 |
16 | Colorado | 7,140,885 | 6,377,405 | 89.3% | 110.7% | 9,816 |
15 | Illinois | 14,973,405 | 13,407,167 | 89.5% | 105.8% | 11,048 |
14 | Pennsylvania | 15,958,205 | 14,329,614 | 89.8% | 111.9% | 9,503 |
13 | Nebraska | 2,123,530 | 1,911,202 | 90.0% | 98.8% | 11,676 |
12 | North Dakota | 726,810 | 654,258 | 90.0% | 85.9% | 14,567 |
11 | Virginia | 10,575,005 | 9,525,279 | 90.1% | 111.6% | 8,025 |
10 | Kentucky | 4,561,845 | 4,114,659 | 90.2% | 92.1% | 10,514 |
9 | Minnesota | 6,620,660 | 6,006,009 | 90.7% | 106.5% | 10,772 |
8 | Nevada | 3,182,690 | 2,895,012 | 91.0% | 94.0% | 11,139 |
7 | Massachusetts | 9,862,460 | 9,040,501 | 91.7% | 131.2% | 10,334 |
6 | New York | 24,506,495 | 22,557,594 | 92.0% | 116.0% | 10,925 |
5 | Vermont | 936,720 | 866,740 | 92.5% | 138.9% | 3,675 |
4 | Washington | 9,570,785 | 8,874,648 | 92.7% | 116.5% | 6,042 |
3 | Connecticut | 4,812,725 | 4,526,780 | 94.1% | 127.0% | 9,836 |
2 | Wisconsin | 6,250,335 | 6,074,585 | 97.2% | 104.3% | 11,676 |
1 | New Mexico | 2,405,105 | 2,447,126 | 99.9% | 116.7% | 9,881 |
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.