Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

France shouldn’t be on ‘amber plus’ list, says analyst

‘Whatever it was that triggered “amber plus” and put France on it, the stated reason of rising Beta cases don’t hold up to further inspection – Robert Boyle

Simon Calder
Travel Correspondent
Friday 23 July 2021 08:20 BST
Comments
Danger zone? A beach on the Côte d’Azur in southern France, on the government’s ‘amber plus’ list
Danger zone? A beach on the Côte d’Azur in southern France, on the government’s ‘amber plus’ list (Simon Calder )

After a special quarantine category, “amber plus,” was created for France, a leading analyst has said the stated reasons are simply wrong.

Late on Friday 16 July, the government said anyone returning from France must quarantine, even if they have been double-vaccinated by the NHS. It set France apart from all other “amber list” countries, from which returning travellers who have been vaccinated by the NHS need not quarantine.

The reason given by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) was the “persistent presence of cases in France of the Beta variant”. This was first identified in South Africa.

But Robert Boyle, former director of strategy at British Airways’ parent company, IAG, has analysed French government data and found that the number of Beta variant cases of coronavirus in mainland France over the summer has declined.

Cases reached peaks of just over 120 on several days in the first half of June. In the week leading up to the UK government’s announcement, they averaged around 60.

“Whatever it was that triggered the government’s decision to create the amber plus list and put France on it, the stated reason of rising Beta cases doesn’t hold up to further inspection,” Mr Boyle wrote in a blog post.

“I can’t see how Beta would ever be able to get a sustainable foothold in the UK. It is outcompeted by Delta, with or without vaccines.”

At the time of the government’s announcement there was speculation in the travel industry and in France that the UK government had included Réunion – the Indian Ocean island that is technically a French département – in its analysis of the risks.

During the week leading up to the announcement, around one-third of Beta variant cases for France as a whole were identified in Réunion.

“Even if the Réunion figures were included, it still seems like a very ‘trigger happy’ response,” said Mr Boyle.

“It would of course be embarrassing to acknowledge that they got it wrong because of a ‘spreadsheet error,’ but they could easily point to further reassuring data on declining Beta cases in France and to newly published evidence from Canada about vaccine effectiveness against Beta as the reason for the change.

“What they certainly shouldn’t do in my opinion is to ‘double down’ on the amber list by adding Spain and Greece to it, as some have been speculating that they might.”

A government spokesperson said: “The Joint Biosecurity Centre has assessed that France is a high-risk Covid-19 destination due to the circulation of variants of concern, most notably the Beta variant, which presents the greatest risk for UK vaccine escape.

“With England entering step four of the roadmap, and restrictions easing for double vaccinated travellers, the government’s top priority is to stop the spread of Covid-19, including protecting our borders from the threat of variants.

“The decision to add countries to the red, amber or green lists is made jointly by ministers, informed by the latest scientific data and public health advice and taking into account a range of factors.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in