Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Is it really necessary to include images of the Prophet Muhammad when teaching about blasphemy?

Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Saturday 27 March 2021 22:48 GMT
Comments
(Getty Images)

We should all be troubled by the use of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad at Batley Grammar School last week, and should reflect on how we respond to the matter. Are we indifferent to an action that knowingly offends the nearly 2 billion Muslims with which we share the planet? Or are we ignorant of the sensitivities of a quarter of the world’s population? 

Equally troubling is community secretary Robert Jenrick’s comments on BBC News that “it must be right that a teacher can appropriately show images of the Prophet Muhammad in a free society”. As many are aware, the Prophet Muhammad is beloved by Muslims, his life and teachings deeply enrich their lives, and pictorial representations of him are forbidden within the faith. It can never be “appropriate” to show his image.  

Cartoon depictions are considered to be particularly disparaging and demeaning, and inevitably provoke a strong reaction from Muslims. No right-thinking person, Muslim or otherwise, believes that intimidation and violence have any place in this issue, but, as mindful citizens, we should recognise that certain matters require careful handling and special consideration.   

This is not an issue of censorship or free speech, it is one of consideration towards the sensitivities of others. In a globalised world, in which the UK is determined to be a key player, it is incumbent upon us to be respectful to the beliefs of other cultures and religious groups, even if we do not understand or agree with them.   

The bottom line is that it is not necessary to include images of the Prophet Muhammad when teaching the topic of blasphemy – discussion would suffice. It is therefore unsurprising that showing cartoons of the Prophet, in the UK or elsewhere, is perceived by Muslims to be a deliberate provocation. 

The comments by Robert Jenrick, which appears to give carte blanche for teachers to show images of the Prophet Muhammad in lessons, will likely cause further agitation and provocation in the Muslim community, harm community cohesion and give fuel to right-wing groups.  

Carolyn Edwards

Leeds

Faith is a choice

All my life I have campaigned for anti-oppressive practice, but I am deeply troubled by the power that is being given to the protesters outside of Batley Grammar School.

Unlike colour, gender, sexual orientation and disability, faith is a choice, and sadly most faiths have a dogmatic position of “it is our way or the highway”, which is not acceptable in our tolerant culture. I believe it is incumbent on our education system to teach our young people these tolerant values of our society and to consider alternatives, thus giving them the ability to question. I wholeheartedly support the teacher who is becoming the victim of an intolerant witch hunt and fear the route we will be going down if he is not backed by the authorities.

Ian Marsh

Address supplied

Religious animosities

The cartoons ridiculing Prophet Muhammad are interminably repugnant. Schools, colleges and universities are supposed to remain fortifications of knowledge, information exchange, intellectual curiosity and inquisitiveness, social cohesion and inclusivity and racial and religious diversity. Such cartoons do not promote such noble principles. On the contrary, they sow the seeds of religious animosities, hatred and intolerance.

Dr Munjed Farid Al Qutob

London

Read more:

Patriotism 

It’s disturbing to see ministers have announced that henceforth all government buildings will fly the union flag every day, purportedly to encourage feelings of patriotism among the populace. Curiously, this jingoistic directive comes from the same government that is currently actively encouraging tax avoidance by setting up free ports all around the country.

It strikes me that if people really want to be patriotic then they probably ought to pay their taxes in this country – and in full. Then perhaps we wouldn’t be forced to resort to punishing our health workers with real-terms pay cuts year after year, nor to cut the numbers of our police, firefighters and armed forces time and again.

Patriotism is about taking pride in one’s country. Anybody can wave a bloody flag – it’s no less hollow a gesture than standing on a doorstep and clapping.

Julian Self

Milton Keynes

China sanctions

China is subjecting Iain Duncan Smith to sanctions following “lies about China”. Given the comments and claims made by Duncan Smith during the referendum campaign, surely this is an e example that both the EU and the British people could learn from.

Phil Whitney

Derbyshire

Alba Party

We simply don't need the new Alex Salmond-led Alba party. The Scottish Green Party led by Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater already ticks the box and backs Indyref2. They helped Nicola Sturgeon in her recent vote of confidence and Mr Harvie has been excellent in backing the complainants during the harassment fiasco. So vote for the principled Mr Harvie who will do all he can to save our planet or for Mr Salmond, a man with an ego so big he refuses even now to apologise to those on the receiving end of his inappropriate behaviour.

Paul Morrison

Glasgow

Coronavirus Act

I’ve obviously misunderstood. In my innocence, I thought that the Coronavirus Act, giving the government emergency powers, was necessary because laws might need to be made and enacted in a hurry as the pandemic progressed. But when they were trying to make up their mind about the first lockdown they took weeks to decide. And when they were going to quarantine people arriving in the UK from abroad, they gave 10 days warning, so a lot of travellers were able to beat the deadline. Parliament would have had time to debate and vote on both of those.

So why did so many MPs vote to extend the emergency powers for another six months, when it achieves nothing useful? Seems like another power-grabbing opportunity for Boris Johnson.

Susan Alexander

South Gloucestershire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in