Certainly, it’s essential to make a harmed individual feel as restored as possible, but this approach is does not result in true justice. Developed in culturally, ethnically and racially homogenous communities such as Nepal, restorative justice has achieved some success in those settings. However, in the comparatively heterogenous United States, where Black and brown people disproportionately are on the socio-economic margins and disparately treated in the criminal justice system, restorative justice is inadequate. It holds criminally charged individuals accountable, but does not hold accountable the systems and institutions that have failed many of them. For example, when a young Black man in largely impoverished West Philadelphia steals a bike from a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, also located in West Philly, restorative justice requires that the young person talk face-to-face with the professor, apologize and pay for the stolen item. This race- and class-blind model does little to address factors that often fuel crime.