In Bucks County, Democracy Dies in Silence: PA State House Election Forum on Education Canceled Due to Lack of Candidate Participation
By Cyril Mychalejko,
2024-09-05
We have a democracy crisis in Bucks County.
Bucks County’s chapters of the NAACP and League of Women Voters announced Wednesday that a scheduled Pennsylvania State House candidate forum on education scheduled for September 12 at Bucks County Community College had to be canceled.
Why? Apparently too many candidates weren’t interested in participating.
This is disgraceful, inexcusable, and quite frankly pathetic. What’s worse, I am unaware of any other candidate forums or debates scheduled before the November 5 election.
First, I’m not sure congratulations are in order for the six candidates who agreed to participate since this is the bare minimum of what voters should expect from people expecting their vote. Nevertheless, the one Republican and five Democrats should be recognized:
Shame on all of them. They are the reason why this event was canceled.
“Our concern is candidates are controlling information by putting what they want us to know on their website and not making themselves available to answer constituents’ questions,” said Bucks NAACP President Karen Downer, explaining that this leads to voter apathy and suppresses voter participation.
This nonpartisan forum would have given candidates a chance to answer questions pre-submitted by the public on where they stand, and in some cases have voted on, on issues such as education funding for K-12, school vouchers, book banning/censorship, and school safety.
“Our intent was to give our representatives a platform for their constituents to meet them. It was a forum, not a debate,” said Downer. “Like a job interview, we should have an opportunity to meet the people who are applying for the job.”
That seems sensible.
Downer said that candidates even had the choice to only answer questions they wanted. I actually don’t agree with this candidate coddling and think this is very problematic, but it was their event and they didn’t want to “put anyone on the spot.” But isn’t that kind of what we should be doing – putting each candidate on the spot on the issues that we care about most?
What compounds this problem is a lack of local reporting on what’s happening in Harrisburg and with these races. In Gannett’s Bucks County Courier Times and Intelligencer newspapers, this reporting is virtually nonexistent. The Bucks County Herald doesn’t fare much better, though they just launched a “ Both Sides Now ” initiative where candidates in each race are invited to write a 600-word OpEd on whatever they want. However, given that it is a 600-word OpEd on whatever they want makes it more of a gimmick than a serious effort to educate voters. This just exacerbates our local democracy crisis.
The fact that candidates and elected officials don’t feel obligated to participate in a forum like what the Bucks County NAACP and League of Women Voters were kind enough to attempt to organize should both worry and enrage Bucks County voters. Democracy can’t function without candidate transparency and accessibility, and high-information voters. At a time of rampant misinformation and now AI-generated nonsense, it’s more important than ever for candidates to be accessible “IRL” (in real life) for voters to hear first-hand information that informs their votes.
All of these candidates must do better and we must demand better. Democracy depends on it.
DUMOCRAT PROPAGANDA : ARE WE BETTER OFF NOW THAN WE WERE 4YRS AGO. H E L L NO.❗️.BIDENs BUILD BACK BETTER. YEA. THAT 💩 ISENT WORKING. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. 🇺🇸 NOV. 5
Free Thinker
09-08
They put statements out on their websites but not available to answer questions ? Sounds like media tactics to me.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.